Atonement Is My Favorite of the Year!

The genuinely talented Joe Wright has made a film to make us believe in movies again.

This article was published in the December 10, 2007, edition of The New York Observer.

When she was bad: Saoirse Ronan and James McAvoy.
Focus Features
When she was bad: Saoirse Ronan and James McAvoy.

ATONEMENT
Running time 123 minutes
Directed by Joe Wright
Written by Christopher Hampton
Starring Keira Knightley, James McAvoy

Despite all expectations, 2007 is turning out to be a sorry year for movies. That’s why Atonement has rejuvenated my flagging energy at the very last minute. Elegantly directed by Joe Wright (Pride and Prejudice), meticulously acted by a perfect cast, immaculately adapted by the great British screenwriter Christopher Hampton and lavishly filmed with a respect for both intimate detail and sweeping narrative, Atonement is everything a true lover of literature and movies could possibly hope for. It is unquestionably, without any reservations, my favorite film of the year.

Based on the critically praised best seller by Ian McEwan, it’s a story of a youthful jealousy that leads to a monstrous falsehood that in turn ruins the lives of a disparate group of people, and ultimate retribution that comes decades too late. On the hottest day of the summer in 1935, just a few years before the war, the wealthy, vacationing Tallis family is expecting guests at their vast country estate. Precocious youngest daughter Briony, a fledgling writer of 13, played by the patrician and deeply sensitive newcomer Saoirse Ronan, is impressionable, sexually naïve and resentful of the attention older sister Cecilia (Keira Knightley) receives from the boys, especially the hunky gardener Robbie (James McAvoy), the housekeeper’s son, who’s beneath their social station, and whose college education at Cambridge has been financed by their father.

From an upstairs window, Briony watches Cecilia strip off her clothes and lure Robbie into the fountain. Nothing happens beyond a kiss, but Briony’s scheming imagination sets into motion the mischief that will impact their lives forever. When the girls’ older brother Leon (Patrick Kennedy) arrives for the weekend with an arrogant friend who drunkenly assaults a female cousin, Briony falsely identifies the innocent Robbie as the rapist. Convicted and punished for a sex crime, Robbie’s life is ruined. Four years later, he leaves prison and joins the army, but the estranged Cecilia has remained true, and the unjustly separated lovers endure years of grief, desire and emotional tension in the Henry James tradition until they meet in a moving scene set in a terminal cafe right out of Brief Encounter. The repressed Briony, meanwhile, surmounts her own class boundaries by nursing the broken bodies of soldiers in a war-torn hospital, but making amends comes late. Decades later, when she turns the saga into a hugely successful novel for posterity, everyone is relieved that the story had a happy ending. Or did it? In an electrifying finale, offered almost as a postscript, Vanessa Redgrave appears as the dying Briony to publicize her book, still suffering guilt for the damage caused by the deluded fiction of her youth, and reveals the actual facts. Atonement at last? True or false, a writer always has the last word.

The genuinely talented Joe Wright does an engrossing job of turning literature into cinematic poetry. In one magnificently constructed scene after another, he transports us from the idyllic sunlight and chlorophyll of the British countryside darkened by the storm clouds of approaching war, to the blood and chloroform of the trenches in France, the terror in the streets and bomb shelters of London and the galvanizingly surreal nightmare on the beaches of Dunkirk, shot in the perpetual half-light of an abandoned carnival with a bombed carousel in the backdrop. The sets and costumes stagger the imagination. And a uniformly brilliant cast brings three-dimensional humanity to the pages of Christopher Hampton’s script. The impulsive Briony, who sends the wrong man to hell, is played at different stages in her life by two remarkable actresses—Ms. Ronan is a staggeringly assured youngster, and Romola Garai as the mature version of the same tortured character is haunting. They both outclass and upstage the lovely but serenely bland Keira Knightley, who is all cold angles without soft edges. As the wronged man, James McAvoy fulfills the promise he showed in The Last King of Scotland, easily emerging as the film’s star in an honest, heart-rending performance of strength and integrity that overcomes the romantic slush it might have been.

Atonement is both a lyrical adaptation of great fiction and a revelation of the potential power of cinema to twist, mould, convince and entertain. Cynics may dismiss it as a period weepie from the Merchant/Ivory school, but Atonement is so much more than that. The five-minute tracking shot of the carnage at Dunkirk, the rush of water surging through a tube station as people die seeking shelter from the blitz, nurses marching in formation around a hospital as the lights go off, one by one, above them—all indelible images that transform a great book many called “unfilmable” into an overwhelming experience that has revived my faith in motion pictures.

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

Joi (not verified) says:

It's so disappointing that this amazing movie has such a "limited release." It's really frustrating when your favorite actress is getting such great reviews and you can't even see her movie. Arrrgghhh!

Anyway, I'm thrilled the movie's getting great buzz such as this and hope it does well in the few theaters it's being shown in!

Ben Dover (not verified) says:

Of course Rex would like this movie. He loves the dresses and shoes.

Leslie Armstrong (not verified) says:

I do wish you would not give away so much information. I'm glad you liked it, but the movie is now ruined for me. Nothing will be unfolding except perhaps the final twist as you have already spoilt it by giving it all away.

Spencer de Vere (not verified) says:

Rex, I haven't seen the film, but I loved your review. I would suggest though, that the crowd who drum for the unlovely Michael Moore and who think that Iraq is Hitlerian in its horror, will omit it from their Awards choices.

RENTON (not verified) says:

I saw it in Toronto and it's a great movie. Leslie needn't worry. There's still plenty that hasn't been spoiled.

Heraled88 (not verified) says:

Saw it in Atlanta and its not good and I usually love these type of period dramas. The acting is flat and McAvoy was better in Becoming Jane. It drags until you think there is going to be some climax and nothing just finding out at the end during an interview the real fate of the lovers - most in our audience were like soooooooooo.

Lisa Moore (not verified) says:

Yell, did you manage to tell me everything now? I guess I don't have to waste my money since you and other reviewers just about told everything. Thanks for nothing.

NoGuff (not verified) says:

Why does anyone still give a crap what Rex Reed says?

Lindy Harrison (not verified) says:

I'm delighted that Rex Reed has found a film that sends him into transports, and I look forward to seeing what sounds like a future classic (if I can find it, that is - apparently it's in limited release).

Just one small point: It seems to me that Rex' dismissive tone when mentioning the "Merchant/Ivory weepies" betrays either a fading memory or subtle hypocrisy - I seem to remember his raving over several of them at one time or another.

Danny Moss Yahoo (not verified) says:

The 5 minute tracking scene on the Dunkirk beach was the best I have scene since the Goodfellas tracking years ago..

PHOCUS (not verified) says:

Could it be that 'real' movies are being made by real movie makers? Where's the political disgust? Where's the hate for America? How could this happen? Is it safe to go back to the theaters? With fingers crossed, I will venture out...wish me luck.

Jedsil (not verified) says:

I will catch this one on cable. The movie theater experience today horrible; a film must be truly world class to lure me out and this ain't it. Although I am a sucker for a good period piece, I'll pass. And Rex Reed's opinion means almost as much as Larry King's, who has never seen a bad film when he's been paid to submit a quote.

Sarah M (not verified) says:

I have been waiting for months to see this movie and was also disappointed it got such a limited release. I am hoping all the good buzz and reviews it is getting will get it to my town soon!

Coco Laboy (not verified) says:

With all that's going on in this country, with us facing a watershed year at the polls in 2008 that may determine the fate of the Republic, what with sociopathi religious nuts wanting to turn the clock back 100 years, http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/444125/mitt_romneys_spectacular..., what the heck do I care about one of these Masterpiece Theatre movies that are so beloved by anglophiles who geniuinely lack and perception or taste, so need it spoonfed to them? Why not talk about art that means something and that is actually rooted in real life, not navel-gazing crap about the "power of art." Go see Danie Day-Lewis in THERE WILL BE BLOOD, a great movie about the rapacious petroleum industry that runs this country.

cmv1202 (not verified) says:

Only an asshole could make comments about a movie like this political.

Richard K. (not verified) says:

Rex Reed lost all credibility in past years with his other than orthodox choices and non-winning entities. I saw this film and read the book; not even the same movie. Ms. Reed apparently does not read books. I'll end by saying that I was amazed that this film could attract oddballs like Reed, who try to sway public opinion by revealing a lot of details because he wants to be credited with ruining the film for others.

trench mouth (not verified) says:

I found the guiled human drama of a false identifying statement vis a vis ww2 was hollow. The horrendous enormity of the war and the millions who died or were maimed caste a dark shadow over the tripe of spoiled British gentry.

Even Vanessa Redgrave could not save this film.

Tim Munoz (not verified) says:

It's a movie! Why be political in this type of forum? Just calm down, Rome isn't burning.

Jay (not verified) says:

I have not seen this movie but I do enjoy period pieces and will rent it on DVD based on Mr. Reed's review.

The reason I'm writing is because people are so angry and it makes no sense in this forum. You folks remind me of the types when I was in college who talk for the sake of talking, and seem to miss the points of the discussion thereby dragging the whole conversion down and making everyone else stupider for listening to you. This board should be restricted, and so should you.

DP (not verified) says:

I saw this movie, and it is excellent. My only minor negative was the overly extended sequences in France. However, had I not seen the movie, I would have been extremely upset that a reviewer would disclose almost everything in the plot. I'm sorry for those who read this review before the see the movie.

Merle (not verified) says:

I love Rex Reed's reviews. I was able to see Atonement before I read his review. He is right. Great movie! Best of the year for me so far.

SteadyUnderFire (not verified) says:

Rex Reed it the best. I thought he was great when he was on television...great voice. He's still the only reviewer I read.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

One of THE BEST films of the decade. A delightful example of what film making is truly about. I LOVED this movie!

thegreytgrey (not verified) says:

The reviewer entirely misinterpreted the first third of this film--from the fact that Briony's interpretation was entirely her wild imagining and not an understanding of what actually happened, to the idea that the rape was a drunken assault rather than clearly the endgame of a calculated seduction---and moves to the astounding realization that cinema can twist our point of view. Umm, thanks for that. The middle Briony was brilliant. Vanessa Redgrave was as well, showing a successful but lonely and unhappy Briony, but in such a small part, revealing the truth that left my eyes rolling. In fact, she played the part too well: clearly the happy ending we've experienced could not have occurred and was just another of Briony's misinterpretation of the facts. Knightley...ummm...eye candy here, not much more. As for the young Briony, when children in serious films aren't completely horrible it's easy to overstate their talent. She admirably didn't show emotion, as befits the British upper crust, and followed direction perfectly: "Walk like your marching fast; be important; gasp when surprised."

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.