Brolin Is Golden

No Country For Old Men
Running Time 122 minutes
Written By Joel Coen and Ethan Coen, based on the novel by Cormac McCarthy
Directed by Joel and Ethan Coen
Starring Tommy Lee Jones, Josh Brolin and Javier Bardem
Losing their customary cool, some critics are labeling No Country for Old Men, a modern western with pokey pacing and blood-curdling violence, a masterpiece. Until the five-minute finale that threatens to destroy the whole thing, I found myself dazed, dazzled and overwhelmed. The ending is so lame it made me feverish. Then I remembered the perfection that came before it, and concluded that this is, without question, the best movie ever made by the eccentric Coen brothers, Joel and Ethan. Better even than Fargo. It’s so good that I am powerless to hold a grudge. Yes, I guess I have to admit it’s a masterpiece.
Based on a popular novel by Cormac McCarthy, it’s about the fickle yet inescapable finger of fate and how it points to the taut, ruthless participants in a Texas crime gone terribly wrong. Tommy Lee Jones gives yet another gritty, ravaged performance as a Terrell County sheriff raised on the folklore of the Old West, now faced with the grim reality of how the world has changed. The year is 1980. No saddlebags or loyal horses for easy getaways. No Wells Fargo stagecoach depositing new victims and tearing off with painted harlots from the local saloon and schoolmarms in distress. The criminals in faded plaid shirts, patched denims and worn-out boots ride what’s left of the range in bullet-blasted pickup trucks. Over the top of a butte that looks like a backdrop in a John Ford western, a battered cowboy (Josh Brolin) comes across a gang of corpses left behind in a botched drug deal and makes off with the spoils—a suitcase stuffed with cash. Thus begins a dizzying, horror-filled roller-coaster ride fueled by greed, revenge and violence that blends lyricism with gore. The rest is about the consequences, with one mistake leading to another as a sadistic wacko named Anton Chigurh (Javier Bardem) tracks down the thief, and Sheriff Ed Tom Bell (Jones) stalks them both. It’s as intoxicating as backyard rotgut whiskey, and twice as lethal.
Chigurh is the modern equivalent of a werewolf—a beast with a lust for blood who sends a shadow across the moon while exploring amusing ways to torture and kill his prey and leaving no human trace. In a terrifying performance of hypnotic power, Bardem totes around an air gun for slaughtering cattle, which he uses with ingenuous lust; it’s a strange apparatus that looks like an oxygen tank, with a device on the head of the hose that glows key holes out of door locks and foreheads. Across the Texas Panhandle they go—the calloused sheriff who misses the good old days, the brash thief who knows the only way to stay alive is to summon every reserve of guile and imagination at his disposal, the demon predator, and a stupid bounty hunter (Woody Harrelson) who makes the mistake of crossing their paths at the wrong time. In the ensuing cat-and-mouse game played to the death, varying species of cats show up, but no mice. The surprise, horror-flick suspense and cockeyed humor born of human nature are Coen brother trademarks used with maximum skill to turn theater seats into electric chairs.
The Coens thrive on screwing around with their audience’s minds, and the movie ends up baffling and empty, shooting a round of blanks. The final minutes pose more questions than they answer, the roles are not clearly defined, even the innocent are vulnerable, and we never do find out what happens to the fang-bearing Chigurh. He just disappears. (The book ends the same way.) Who cares? As long as he’s played by Bardem, we don’t have to see him to fear him. He remains the bogeyman we hope never to meet in a dark alley after midnight. Sporting Buster Brown bangs and showing no remorse, conscience or a shred of emotion, Bardem is the noxious centerpiece of this movie. It’s a juggernaut of a performance with Oscar written all over it.
Without a lot of tertiary dialogue or wasted footage, No Country for Old Men has the lonely, muted beauty of the Texas desert at dawn and the haunting dread of dangerous rattlesnakes coiled behind every mesquite brush as it tackles several themes—the unpredictability of fate, the relentless pursuit of evil, the unwise bravado of youth, the safety of wisdom that comes with old age—simultaneously. But it’s the rapacious, carnivorous greed and bloodletting vengeance of Javier Bardem that provides the high-octane jolt you won’t forget.























Javier Bardem rules!
Anyway, the best Coen's film since Barton Fink (much better than Fargo and on par with Miller's crossing).
This is the third piece in the Coen's masterpieces triangle.
Can't wait to see this movie, I am a huge Coen brothers fan, but best ever?? Fargo, Barton Fink (one of the least known or seen of their movies), Miller's Crossing, and Raising Arizona all incredible, but there is and never will be another movie like The Big Lebowski. Not only the best Coen brothers movie ever, but possibly one of the greatest parodies of our time. Great review, hope it lives up to the billing. The Dude abides.
Everyone is raving about this movie. It was released today. I might go to the first evening show tonight, I'm excited to finally see a great movie this year, because there has been so much crap already.
Rex Reed, this is aimed squarely at you.
What brand of arrogance makes you feel you're in a position to review a film and in your first paragraph comment, "Until the five-minute finale that threatens to destroy the whole thing, I found myself dazed, dazzled and overwhelmed."
Do you think talking about the finale may in some way detract from the enjoyment of a film for future viewers?
You're the epitome of why I try and avoid reading critics' opinions prior to seeing a new film. Well done...
What do you expect from rex reed? The ending is excellent, like the rest of the film. Reed doesn't like it because it's not a hollywood sitcom ending where everything is wrapped up neatly with the heroes giving high-fives.
I saw the film last week. The movie as a whole is exquisite, but I agree with Reed. The ending is imperfect. I doubt the book suffers from the same flaw.
Saw the movie this afternoon and was mildly disappointed.
I loved most of the film, until the last 5 minutes blew it for me. I don't need things wrapped up with a bow in order to enjoy them, but it just seemed that the directors didn't have an ending so they went with the old standby, or the book ends in similar fashion. I didn't read the book, so I am not sure if that's the case. Had they simply ended it after Chigurh's last appearance on screen I'd have been fine with it. That would be an ending with loads of unanswered questions that wouldn't have made me say WTF after listening to Jones ramble in the shack.
Solid performances abound, but ultimately it's too bad that I had to leave the theater with an empty feeling due to an open rambling incoherent ending.
I have to agree, that's a blatant spoiler Rex.
By the way, I liked the ending.
Now, after just seeing the film I have to add a few words about the ending, so those who have not had the luck to see No Country stop reading. In the first few lines Jones narrates about the good old days and says he cares about the men before him and will always take the time to listen. Taking time is what the Cohen brothers are asking(well forcing) us to do in the end. To me the ending is as true to life as the gore through out the first 115 min. Jones talks to an old man in a kitchen after he chose not to look under that bed in the hotel room. The man in the wheel chair said he would have not tried to get revenge just as jones' character did not; saying sometimes you have to just stop the bleeding. Then we're stuck listening to jones in his kitchen as the villian who's victorious stops his bleeding and walks of to the sunset. The ending is great by coming full circle making their prior movies look like some spoiled kids film school projects...
Now, after just seeing the film I have to add a few words about the ending, so those who have not had the luck to see No Country stop reading. In the first few lines Jones narrates about the good old days and says he cares about the men before him and will always take the time to listen. Taking time is what the Cohen brothers are asking(well forcing) us to do in the end. To me the ending is as true to life as the gore through out the first 115 min. Jones talks to an old man in a kitchen after he chose not to look under that bed in the hotel room. The man in the wheel chair said he would have not tried to get revenge just as jones' character did not; saying sometimes you have to just stop the bleeding. Then we're stuck listening to jones in his kitchen as the villian who's victorious stops his bleeding and walks of to the sunset. The ending is great by coming full circle making their prior movies look like some spoiled kids film school projects...
If you have not seen the film please don't read any further............................................
On first viewing I had the same feeling about the ending, I was too focused on a confrontation that never took place, between the sherrif and Anton Chigurh, when it didn't happen I felt like I was punched in the gut ... took a second viewing to realize the genius of the film..
And in response to just saw it's comment: Anton was not under the bed, the Sheriff noticed the bathroom window was unlocked and knew he slipped out the back...
Rex Reed is a fool. He writes like a freshman who is working on the "colorful language" section of a writing textbook, hacking out his next review with bits of popcorn stuck to his face. He is a leader in the pack of mindless, twittering spectators who speak of "movies" in between dull pronouncements about the "durn election". For years he has lowered the bar for written interpretations of film, clamoring for more flash-bang and explanatory direction. The blame isn't really Reed's, though. Whoever hired this wet sandbag to write is the one who ought to be ashamed.
I would suggest reading the book.
The movie stayed pretty faithful.
SPOILER ------
The ending is fine. The movie starts with TLJ telling the story, and ends that way, only more desperate.
Your comment is very badly written. You need an editor for the reader to understand your points.
It should have ended sooner, with the scene of the villain walking down the street after buying the shirt off the teen-aged boy. Perfect. Leave the rest to our imaginations!
Asda Story gold Asda Story money buy Asda Story Gold cheap Asda Story gold
Archlord gold Archlord money archlord online Gold Archlord cheap buy Archlord gold
priston tale Gold priston tale Money buy priston tale Gold buy priston tale Gold
shadow of legend Gold sol gold buy shadow of legend Gold cheap shadow of legend Gold shadow of legend Gold money
The ending is very special for this reason.
We say, almost as a cliche, that a story that ends with "and then I woke up" is a bad story because it eliminates all that went before, says that what we've just read, or seen, is a phantom, and we are back in real life. In the case of No Country For Old Men, book and movie, that very ending neither discounts what we've seen, nor eliminates it. It solidifies it in mind, makes what we've witnessed a kind of true history. The phrase has the intentional opposite effect, in this case, than the cliche. It cements the story, and there is never any discounting of it, never any forgetting.
Replica Watches,Fake Watches,Replica Watch,Fake Watch,Wholesale Watches,Wholesale Replica Watches,Jewelry Watches,Replica Jewelry Watches.
Right after Michael Bloomberg received a· 礼品笔, thunderous greeting from the audience, Spitzer walked on stage to
hi
om42r3zkdi0gm2nt
good luck