Real Estate

The Education of Daniel Doctoroff

How the mighty deputy mayor for development learned to love ULURP, the Legislature and building green

This article was published in the December 17, 2007, edition of The New York Observer.

Daniel Doctoroff, the deputy mayor for economic<br />development and rebuilding, will leave City Hall by <br />January to become president of Bloomberg L.P.
Joe Fornabaio
Daniel Doctoroff, the deputy mayor for economic
development and rebuilding, will leave City Hall by
January to become president of Bloomberg L.P.

Once there was Yankee Stadium. Now there is Coney Island.

Once there was the West Side Stadium. Now there are the West Side rail yards.

Once there was Atlantic Yards. Now there is Moynihan Station.

For just about each of Deputy Mayor Dan Doctoroff’s early development projects, there is now another similar one wending its way through a review process. The new one may be just as ambitious--and controversial--as the old, but it is infused with a vastly different sensibility, more patient in its approach, more responsive to the grass-roots community.

As he is about to step down as deputy mayor for economic development and rebuilding, Mr. Doctoroff eschews the idea that he or the Bloomberg administration went through a sea change in the way they approached development over the past six years. But it is hard to deny that he is, if not exactly more conciliatory, at least smarter about what he wants and how to get it.

“It is fair to say that we have become better listeners, and we have reached out earlier and more often to the State Legislature,” Mr. Doctoroff told The Observer in a telephone interview on Dec. 10. “On the other hand, we would not say that we did not go out and promote our ideas before. We have gotten better at it. I would not say there has been a dramatic shift.”

Still, what a shift there has been. On June 15, 2005, the Bloomberg administration announced that it supported a new Yankee Stadium. Without further ado—and in a process critics say ramrodded the project through—eight days later, it got the Legislature to set aside the park land where the ball team would build it.

By contrast, the mayor announced on Nov. 8 of this year that the city wanted to swap park land to make way for a new amusement district in Coney Island. It will hold a couple of public meetings about it, and then leisurely ask that park alienation be introduced in Albany in January, and the city expects that it will take until June to get it passed.

Here’s another example: The same rail yards where city and state taxpayers were supposed to build a platform and allow the New York Jets to build a new stadium is now the subject of a complex private-public, City Hall-Metropolitan Transportation Authority arrangement. This time around, a combination of offices, apartments and stores will be built (along with a new school, a couple of parks and a cultural facility) by a private developer, chosen through a competitive process, who will give a few hundred million dollars to the transit agency’s capital budget; build the platform on his own dime; preserve most if not all of the High Line, the old elevated train track turned park; and put aside a few hundred apartments for low-income families.

Mr. Doctoroff suggested that each of these projects has to be treated independently, and that the process—i.e., the level of community involvement—would vary.

“You cannot take a cookie-cutter approach,” he told The Observer. “Sometimes you have to seize the opportunity and still provide the community input that it deserves.”

But he also added that one of the lessons he learned is that ULURP—the name for the city rezoning process—works. The deliberative, and at times contentious, seven-month review procedure takes a project through a community board, a borough president, the City Planning Commission and, finally, the City Council—with a public hearing and vote at each step.

 

THIS IS QUITE a change from a few years ago, when Mr. Doctoroff and then Governor George Pataki decided to take the West Side Stadium through a state process that avoided the possible contention of city politics. But it was in Albany where Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver killed it; a majority of City Council members ended up supporting the idea.

There is one other project like that—although it ended up getting Mr. Silver’s approval—that Mr. Doctoroff now has second thoughts about. Next Page >

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

Sid Meyer (not verified) says:

So finally he understands that the City's political ULURP process works. Its too bad he can't replay Atlantic Yards so that the political process could downsize what will ultimately be the densest census track in the US. Given that the change in the high end residential market(one that Atlantic yards will never be a part of) dictates that this will have to be revisited, why doesn't the City and the State just go back to square one on Atlantic Yards...

Anonymous123 (not verified) says:

Another self-serving revisionist piece by Matthew Schuerman. Do they pay you to write puff-pieces and lies about developers?

"...but it is infused with a vastly different sensibility, more patient in its approach, more responsive to the grass-roots community."

Ask any of the affected communities ... West Side, Brooklyn, near Yankee Stadium and Columbia ... they will tell you this is a blatantly false statement.

How can you contrast what's happening at Coney Island and somehow conclude there's been a sea change? It's still ram-rodding.

Holding one or two meetings with suits sitting at tables for a few hours, and then doing what they intended in the first place, does not a participatory process make.

Going through ULURP is no watershed. All it takes it to bribe a few Borough Presidents and City Council members with dreams of higher office and campaign contributions, and it's a given. After all, City Planning and Amanda Burden are already a rubber-stamp joke. ULURP adds very little to the outcome.

Of course Doctoroff will say ULURP is "appropriate," they have the ducks lined up in a row. Land Review is an illusion that benefits developers and politicians.

The mistake Doctoroff continues to make is that he's claiming to consult with communities, but he's consulting with those already bought off.

Schuerman in his efforts as chief apologist, doesn't seem to understand that.

Norman Oder (not verified) says:

Just for the record, less than 40% of the Atlantic Yards footprint is MTA railyards--the majority of the site would not, in fact, be state land.

Sid Meyer (not verified) says:

I always wonder how you would do it. The city's ULURP gives the community maximum input. It doesn't give them control. The fact that certain people in the community don't like the outcome doesn't mean they weren't heard. Contrast it with the farce called the state process and its eons ahead. Finally for the most part if you took a vote of the effected communities that you cite you will find the vast majority support it. Yes there is a vocal minority that is against anything- no matter who starts it or votes for it. The Problem with Atlantic Yards more so that any other is that the community was totally disregarded as were the local politicians as well. Sure in the end if there was a vote at the City Council the basic plan for the arena would have been passed but there would be more open space less large signs(the city sign regs were over ruled by the State for some god forsaken reason) and a less dense development. The first casualty will be the affordable housing at AY and the current process does not guarantee the affordable housing will ever be built. You could be sure the City process would have demanded more from the developer no matter who you claim he paid off. Given NY city campaign financing many of the City Council people and most of the Boro presidents are not beholden to a small section of the community and frankly since the people who did the most supporting of AY Dan Doctoroff and the Mayor need no campaign contributions to get where they were you comments beyond being insulting of decent public servants are just wrong.

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.