Barbarians on the Charles
A narrow perspective on the cutthroat ethos at Harvard’s M.B.A. program

MORE
Book Review
Ahead of the Curve: Two Years at Harvard Business School
By Philip Delves Broughton
The Penguin Press, 288 pages, $25.95
Most of the graduates of the Harvard Business School go on to lucrative careers in banking or management. Not Philip Delves Broughton, author of Ahead of the Curve: Two Years at Harvard Business School; his big postgraduate move was penning a tell-all account of his experience at HBS. The fruit of his labors is simultaneously invigorating and infuriating—and finally pointless.
His most surprising revelation is the utter banality of the aspiring millionaires and billionaires: The author’s HBS class consists almost entirely of students fed to the school through the so-called "three Ms" —Mormons, Military, and McKinsey (the consulting firm). Although there are a few students like Mr. Broughton—formerly the Paris bureau chief for London’s Daily Telegraph—who break the mold, the majority of them are interchangeable. At times it seems as though the setting of Ahead of the Curve could easily be a second-tier party school in western Pennsylvania rather than an internationally renowned business school with a $2 billion endowment.
At one hip-hop-themed party early in his first semester ("booze luge" included!), "the music was absolutely deafening, precluding the need for anything approaching a conversation. All we could do was smile awkwardly … and cheer on." (And you wonder why George W. Bush chose HBS?)
The book illustrates the deep-seated dichotomies and schizophrenic contradictions at the vaunted institution. For a school with the lofty mission to "educate leaders who make a difference in the world," HBS has some embarrassing alumni (former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling), and its amoral curriculum teaches students just as much about the inhuman corporate practice of downsizing as it does about ethical global leadership.
The author is very much a stranger to this cutthroat ethos, and his struggles to come to terms with it mark some of the book’s finer moments. Toward the end of his two-year stint, he asks himself, "But why on earth had I put myself through Harvard Business School, of all places, an institution whose purpose was teaching people how to amass and deploy vast resources?" The answer, it appears, was to write a book about it, and that’s somewhat frustrating.
WHAT DO YOU SUPPOSE the good people in the admissions office would have said had he notified them of his intent to write a book chronicling his adventures? In his preface, Mr. Broughton informs the reader, "I did not go to Harvard Business School planning to write a book." He adds, "This … was never intended as an inside raid." Intent is all well and good, but there are countless moments recorded here that Mr. Broughton could only have experienced under the presumed, though unofficial, cloak of privacy.
While the author is generally fair to his subjects, there are some embarrassing incidents for classmates, professors and guest lecturers. During a school-sponsored trip to Silicon Valley, students were visited by venture capitalist Tim Draper, who generously offered his insights to the aspiring business leaders of tomorrow and concluded his lecture by performing a motivational song he’d written himself: "When the song reached the chorus, Draper began waving his arms and shouting, ‘All together. Come on. Sing!’" A private lecture becomes an opportunity to ridicule a New Age financier. Mr. Draper can console himself with his billions, but other Broughton foils are not so fortunate.
Mr. Broughton saves his best shots for a classmate whom he clearly disliked, and though he altered the names of some of his fellow students, it still seems like a breach of trust. His pen becomes a weapon, and he aims it squarely at "Linda"—"a small, angry New Yorker who had been a management consultant … who said her real passion was racial and sexual equality." During one group exercise, Linda became a caricature of a squealing tyrant, referred to by one of Mr. Broughton’s pals as a "one-conversation Nazi." Mr. Broughton lets that characterization stand.
There are many incisive moments in Ahead of the Curve. It offers an interesting glimpse into the cloistered universe of a business school, but it’s still just one person’s perspective. No other student or professor is given the opportunity to round out the picture. Mr. Broughton’s book reads a little like a diary chronicling the initial phase of an early midlife crisis: It suffers from the self-centered nature of the enterprise.
Oliver Haydock is on the staff of The Observer. He can be reached at ohaydock@observer.com.



























First I should say that I have not read this book. Nor do I plan to, based on this review. I find the concept of the book disappointing, as it in no way reflects the experiences I had when I attended HBS in the late 1980s. I came from a career in the supermarket industry, and sat between a former wind-sail entrepreneur from Canada and someone from the Ministry of Finance in Japan. Sure, there were plenty of classmates from consulting firms and I-banks, but there was a broader mix as well.
When I was there, the Social Enterprise Initiative was not yet created, and the specific classes on ethics were just being created (along with plenty of discussion about whether ethics can be taught, or is something that one develops from one's upbringing) but I didn't find the curriculum "amoral." Wharton had Michael Milliken, other schools have had other less-than-wonderful graduates come through - but those tend to be exceptions, not the rule.
I also found that, once people really started to understand the grading system, there was a lot of cooperation and collaboration (though its true there were more individual assignments than team assignements - something I understand they have since modified). The competitive intensity generally came from within, as that is often a part of the character of people inspired to attend HBS - but I was surprised at how many strong and lasting relationships I still have today from those years.
Sounds to me like Mr. Broughton may not have known why he was attending HBS, and may have missed out on a lot of its potential based on his world view... That's a shame.
Barry
I have just given up an MBA programme with Curtin university of Australia at Miri Campus in East Malaysia. Unfortunately they lined up Organizational Behaviour in the first trimester. I've always had an interest in this subject and wanted to go forward in my learning, not backward. For example, I questioned why the term 'alienation' was missing in the official text. The lead lecturer who taught us 'Communication' among other topics is yet to answer all of my e-mails. For the case study, our group had to focus on the theme 'teamwork'. It so happened that I split from the 'team' and did my own 5 minute quickie of a presentation. My argument within the group was that a case study should talk about the given story in the light of the theories we learn. My new-found mates were obviously planning a management lecture. In the group presentation, the 'leader' who sidelined me with purely body language was the only student who could not recall the name of the company we were talking about. Even the other groups who did better and were much nicer to me failed to relate the theory to the case. They were repeating the theory in their respective focus areas. To pre-empt such an occurrence, I wrote to the lead lecturer that she was responsible if the students did not know what a case study was meant to be. In the presentation, the second lecturer was quite impressed with everybody, and did not raise a single comment about the crack in the team promoting teamwork. So was the interest of the faculty in the subject.
As I split from the group, I was group-less for the other module that was running parallel. My tormentor being the class representative did not help me insinuating into another group. Knowing that there was another student 'left behind,' I teamed up with her at the eleventh hour to stitch up a survival essay for the module. With an official co-coordinator, lead lecturer and a tutor, there was nobody to address an obvious problem.
Then came the second trimester. When the group formation was giving me premonitions, I directly asked the university co-coordinator to look into the matter and sort out the grouping. I know that intelligent people love to engage themselves in problems in relevant areas, for that is what gives them satisfaction and sense of achievement. But this fair lady was too laissez-faire minded. And we learnt in the previous trimester that laissez-faire management, at any rate, was not good.
So I quit.
In the ill-fated teamwork, three of my mates made reconciliatory remarks which were hushed up by the leader who claimed I was ousted on a majority decision. What they did not know was that the majority could not decide if 'teamwork' was one-word or two-word. Only a proper dictionary can do that. 'If they were right,' commented Einstein about the book titled "One Hundred Authors against Einstein," 'one would have been sufficient.'
One rather rude way to look at an MBA is as an opportunity for the cut-throats to learn buzz words.
On a more positive note, MBAs give us knowledge that can be used for personal, corporate and social improvement, but MBAs do not make good managers. My observation is that, after, say, the age of 25, only a life changing drama would change the mould of the people.
Management training is a paid outing. MBA is a handsome title.
I will never step into the territory of the soft subjects roamed by pathetic and apathetic academics again. I would rather read books on economics and magaziness like Harvard Business Review.
To quote from my MBA essays, 'Manager is the weak link in industry. That is because he (and rarely she) is a political creature, rather than a technical caretaker.'
I have clearly seen how the MBA gurus promote political behaviour and shun reasoning power. And the new authors of the globalized block have framed the theories to suite their taste. That is why I wrote: 'Behavioural science does not behave like a science.'