Blame Canada? What Has Happened to the Toronto Film Festival? Is Viggo Our Only Hope?
Charlie Kaufman’s latest? A bucket of rancid swill! But how about those celebs! There’s slimy troll Colin Farrell! Shirley MacLaine just arrived ... on a jet! SWOOSH!

MORE
On the Town
The annual Toronto International Film Festival, a.k.a. TIFF, is usually the barometer that tests the temperature of the coming movie year. But this year, the 33rd installment has tested a whole lot more: patience, I.Q.’s, trash resistance, and bladder control. Film festivals (and let’s face it, there’s one in every town) have good years and bad years. For Toronto, this is a bad one. Veterans who have been coming here for decades all agree. The fun days when fans and critics and movie moguls all stayed in the Sutton Place Hotel and turned the Bistro 990 across the street into their local commissary, trading anecdotes with John Cassevetes and hanging out with Clint Eastwood, are only memories, like first marriages.
With 1,200 press and industry passes tightly clutched by mobs fighting to see more than 300 movies in 10 days, the thing is so over-programmed that you face at least five schedule conflicts per hour. Not satisfied with glut, the Canadians moved on to über-glut. Spreading the TIFF circus from one end of town to the suburbs, Toronto staged three other film festivals at the same time and blocked off an entire square to show free movies like Citizen Kane to the unwashed masses with empty wallets and no entree to the main events. Hotel room rates have tripled from what they are the rest of the year; Canadian suburbanites in convertibles cruise the streets looking for celebrities; loitering American tourists in knockoff sunglasses block the entrances and exits to every screening; and teenage gawkers litter the sidewalks hoping for a glimpse of Brad Pitt. But it’s hard to spot the major players with any kind of legitimate reason for being there, and the real stars sneak in and out of back doors, surrounded by bodyguards. But still they come. Anne Hathaway, Michael Caine, Debra Winger, Julianne Moore, Susan Sarandon and Tim Robbins, Mark Ruffalo, Ed Harris, Renée Zellweger, George Clooney, Jeremy Irons, Greg Kinnear, Keira Knightley, Ralph Fiennes, Liam Neeson, Antonio Banderas, Laura Linney, Colin Farrell—looking like a slimy troll in sandals and a toque; they came, they fled. The parties this year have been dismal, the bar bills astronomical, the food all served on sticks. (I never want to see another chicken kabob again as long as I live.) Assaulted at every red light by press agents selling, marketing moguls buying, and the ubiquitous publicity hound Paris Hilton, sucking up paparazzi oxygen, I escaped to TIFF’s most prized invite—the famous yearly chicken-pot-pie lunch at the Four Seasons staged by veteran Hollywood columnist George Christy, where I rubbed elbows with Norman Jewison and such non-showbizzy folk as ex-prime minister of Canada Brian Mulroney and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
In addition to plugging moves, the TIFF has become a magnet for everyone with a cause to promote or a product to launch. Terrified of missing out on something, people who haven’t made a movie in years arrived to pose. Shirley MacLaine flew in from Santa Fe to accept a humanitarian award. Matt Damon hosted a charity benefit to raise money for needy children. A visibly ill Michael J. Fox unveiled a star in his name on Toronto’s Walk of Fame. You see everything at the TIFF. Boy George acted as DJ at one club venue where Lindsay Lohan sucked face for the cameras with girlfriend Samantha Ronson; hordes of screaming rockers jammed the rap party hosted by Sean Combs, a.k.a. Puff Daddy or P. Diddy or whatever it is he calls himself now. Three pop divas—Queen Latifah, Jennifer Hudson, and Alicia Keys—graced another party but did not sing a note. The TIFF, grouse the old-timers, has turned into a Hollywood shopping mall. Some of it is fun, but the sad fact must be faced: Taking a cue from the vulgarity of Cannes, the purity of joy fueled by a passion for movies that once made Toronto a kind of class reunion for serious film buffs has been replaced by gridlock and greed.
But what—you have a perfect right to ask—about the movies? The projectors never stop running. Even the subway system is showing what it called a “fun and free alternative to TIFF,” running one-minute films across a digital network of screens in 300 subway station platforms. Polite to the outer limits of exasperation, Canadians will sit through anything; good or bad, they applaud everything. The opening night film is traditionally Canadian, which gives everyone a night off. It’s the first and last time you can eat a proper meal in the ecstasy of leisure. This year it was Passchendaele, an epic about the slaughter of 5,000 Canadians on the World War I battlefields of Belgium in 1917. What a bore, and Stanley Kubrick did it better 50 years ago with Paths of Glory. Next came Burn After Reading, an alleged Coen brothers comedy with a criminally wasted all-star cast that is never remotely funny—more cornball than screwball. Part campy pastiche, part goofy, paranoid spy thriller, this fiasco fails to either convince or entertain at any level. Brad Pitt, sporting a doo-wop hairdo with frosted tips, is a fitness trainer who gets mixed up in a blackmail scheme involving a C.I.A. analyst (a cross-eyed John Malkovich) and a plastic-surgery-obsessed Internet dater (Frances McDormand). Brain-dead performances by George Clooney and Tilda Swinton never deliver the laughs this misguided mess desperately needs. It’s a miserable experience. The Coens have a habit of following serious, well-made, critically acclaimed films (Blood Simple, Fargo) with idiot farces (The Big Lebowski). But treading water on the heels of the Oscar-winning No Country for Old Men with a lame, insipid, ludicrously overacted load of junk like this is inexplicable, nose-thumbing career lunacy. Worse still was the incomprehensible Synecdoche, New York, a bucket of rancid swill as pretentious as its unpronounceable title, a directorial debut not so much lensed as regurgitated by the dismally untalented Charlie Kaufman, who writes movies about how he can’t write movies. So what makes anyone think he could direct one? Showcasing a repulsive performance by Philip Seymour Hoffman that is beneath discussion, it was generally considered the most contemptible of all the 300-plus films in Toronto, not even rising to the standards of an Australian shocker called Not Quite Hollywood: The Wild, Untold Story of Ozploitation! It described an “Ozploitation” flick as full of “boobs and pubes” and promised a “full-frontal explosion of sex, violence and horror!” Takes one to know one.
Amid the paranoia surrounding the search for Toronto’s latest serial killer and Sarah Palin-inspired editorials excoriating soccer moms, the daily newspapers during the TIFF vibrated with buzz that Téa Leoni bailed from the premiere of her new movie Ghost Town because she was too embarrassed by husband David Duchovny’s high-profile check-in for sex addiction to make a public appearance. What nonsense. I’m convinced she canceled for a much better reason: She saw the picture. Directed by writer David Koepp (Jurassic Park), this sub-mental bomb is about a Manhattan dentist (played by porcine TV question mark Ricky Gervais) who dies for seven minutes in the middle of a colonoscopy, leaving him with the ability to see dead people, and resulting in a series of awkward scenes in which he talks to a lot of noisy, pushy ghosts nobody else can see. These lost souls, wandering the earth with unfinished business in search of a mortal who can act as intermediary, include an obnoxious cheating husband (Greg Kinnear, in his first unbearable role) who needs to ease his wife’s pain so he can rest in peace. When the dentist himself falls in love with the angry widow (Téa Leoni), a museum curator who specializes in preserving the penises of Egyptian mummies, he starts three-way conversations only two people can hear. Then he dies again, and … oh, the agony of it all. Rare audience members who sat through the whole thing were left with a serious need for a dose of the dentist’s nitrous oxide themselves. Next Page >



























Jealous of TIFF because Tribeca is a minor festival footnote?
OMG.
we've arrived!
thank you wrex. (that's the canadian spelling)
we applaud you...no matter how hideous you are.
from, timmy in toronto
As you noted, there were 300 films at TIFF. You commented almost exclusively on the rare few that already have distribution, that already have a notable name attached to them, and that already have a commercial release date -- films that Hollywood and their pseudo independent distribution companies exhibit at the festival to create media buzz.
That TIFF has chosen to sell-out in this way is appalling. That they allow these Hollywood high flyers to leverage TIFFs notoriety to journalists like you is disappointing. But ironically, and seemingly without knowing it, you added to TIFFs dark twist of fate by ignoring many worthwhile films, choosing instead to waste your words on undeserving pulp.
I agree that in many ways the festival is a shadow of its former self and in no small measure has resulted from Executive Director Piers Handling's (and his Board's) decision to segregate the industry screenings (with the exception of the GALA films) from the oh-so-ordinary public screenings. But to argue your point from a position where you criticize the film fans who set aside 10 days of their year to watch 5 films a day, to dismiss those ordinary film lovers who teach Math the rest of the year; who can no more get a ticket to a GALA film than their dog, is a mistake on your part -- and on the part of the Observer for financing your trip (or was it a studio who underwrote your partying?).
Just remember it's the 400,000 people that attend the 290 films that did not make it into the GALA program that make TIFF what it is. [Yes, I know, Aronovsky's film was not a GALA pic, but it had Mickey O'Rourke buzz].
Those 400,000 paid admissions don't gorge on the stars, or schmooze at the after parties, or gawk at gowns on the red carpet. They "applaud" a film, good or bad, because they respect the risks taken by filmmakers and producers and the countries that finance them -- and they applaud TIFFs programmers who selected them so they could see work that will NEVER be commercially distributed.
That's why I was there. And you? You might want to answer that question before you choke on yet another chicken-on-a-stick.
Mr. Reed
Holy shit! What a sad, and bitter article you've written. I'd gladly take your ticket and accomidations next year, since you clearly have ruined a wonderful experience for yourself. It truly sounds as though you made up your mind about everyone and everything at the TIFF long ago, therefore eliminating any joy from the event. Of course you did enjoy the Viggo stuff, as demonstarted in your final ass-kissing paragraph or so, but the rest was just a typical demonstration of spoiled and arrogant film-critic behavior.
I can never tell if you guys are bitter because you don't have what it takes to be a film maker, and are left to tear down those who do - or if you believe you have been forced into a career that makes you miserable on a daily basis, so you find it necessary to inflict as much verbal abuse as possible on the artists you review.
I think you have one of the greatest jobs on the planet. Travelling around the world to watch films, interview amazing people, and have the general public listen to what you think, sounds like TOO MUCH FUN! As I said, I will gladly take your place next year, so you may avoid a repeat of such a terrible trip. And while my response may seem biting, I'm being quite genuine - I'd love to go!
Jason
Hopefully, your kind will stay out of our fair city & festival.
If this is any indication we'll get the original Tiff; when
we can enjoy movies from around the WORLD.
Somebody has to check this Wrex's pulse where do you get off and write BS like this, if this is the way you feel Mr. Wrex, don't come to Toronto and TIFF again. Review all your work at home
Good heavens, Mr. Reed,
What a pretentious snob you are. Only you could complain about a film festival showing movies to the public (Citizen Kane in Dundas Square) and giving an achievement award to Michael J. Fox. Public movie showings and achievement awards? What is the film festival coming to?
Apart from my own complaints this year about TIFF's dismal screenings in general and the nasty kick in the teeth from the organizers to long-time fest-goers who usually purchase the advance packages, I only have two comments for Mr. Reed:
(1) You really love to hear yourself rant, don't you?
(2) This reveals more about the ubiquitous celeb-obsessed American culture more than it says anything about ours.
Blame who? Blame America.
Thanks Mr Reed.
You managed to expose the dying dinosaur that movie class & taste once was. Only problem to be faced now is that you've been poisoning the creature for decades. Thanks for you're contribution to movie evolution.
So, first of all, learn how to spell "accomodations." Secondly, if you wish to tell off a film critic, especially one in the business for decades with a solid reputation and a brain for truly good films, think of something new other than calling him miserable and not good enough to be a film maker. It is the job of film critics to "critique" films, dear.
Mr Reed,
Sounds like you need to take a break from TIFF...
As for the free films playing to the "unwashed masses with empty wallets and no entree to the main events" in a downtown square, everyone I knew who attended these free events also had a ticket to at least one TIFF film. I squeezed in 2 free documentaries and 2 free concerts in between 17 TIFF screenings and working. I found the documentaries educational, teaching me about elements of film making that I had never considered, and the concerts fantastic. The square was one of the best things about TIFF08. What's wrong with democratizing the festival and potentially growing a future audience base among the great unwashed?
As someone who attended this year's Toronto Film Festival, I have to agree with Mr. Reed. It was chaotic, especially because of the cold weather and more rainier days than usual. Standing in a Rush line - or even a ticket-holder's line - is no fun with the wind whipping litter (yes, Toronto is filled with litter; heck, they even have drive-by shootings in tourist areas) and with rain falling in torrents. The volunteers who workt he lines were not up to the task this year. And there weren't very many of them, unlike past festivals.
Also, the venues for showing movies are tiny and cramped with insufficient bathrooms and overpriced concessions - way overpriced. In fact, even the tickets for movies were overpriced. $22.95 for a regular film; $40 for a Gala. And for an ordinary film-lover, you have to sit in the second or third balacony of a hideous concert hall to see a Gala movie. Toronto is really obsessed with gray concrete both inside and outside their buildings. I will have to write that TIFF did rent out some space at the megaplex the AMC 24 at Dundas and Yonge, but the place was still showing regular movies, so that was chaotic.
As for annoying celebrity pets like Paris Hilton or Lindsay Lohan or Puff Daddy (whatever), it is easy to avoid them. However, they do bring with them a cadre of publicists and gofers who treat moviegoers with contempt.
Another negative was the special ID card given to anybody who donated $250 to the festival - no strings attached. What this card did was allow these people to cut lines at the ticket window, avoid rush seating, and even get into a movie ahead of people with real tickets. Show the card and you get to move ahead of everybody for either a seat or a chance to buy a ticket. It was hideous and made normally quiet Torontonians very angry.
But going to a film festival is about going to the movies, and this year, except for Slumdog Millionaire, Rachel Getting Married, Gommora (Italy), JCVD (Van Damme), A Perfect Day (Italy), and The Wrestler, the pickings were mighty slim. I saw 24 films over 8 days, and those were the only six I could possibly recommend. Burn After Reading stinks.
You are an ugly person. Your article proves it.
Thanks,
BaronVonChickenPants.com
Meoow! Saucer of milk to table two!
烘焙论坛,美食论坛友情链接
烘焙论坛,内容都是有关烘焙,烘培的原创帖,每日坚持更新!
开站2个月已经升为烘焙类网站搜索结果前列,google,百度收录正常!
现欲寻找美食,烘焙类的网站,或者生活类论坛交换
家庭烘焙论坛:
I still love you Rex happy to see you are still in the game.
Trust all is fair in NYC
Nike Shox
Nike Air Max TN
Nike Dunk Low
Nike Dunk High
Nike Air Force 1
Nike Air Max 360
Adidas Adicolor Sneakers
Puma Speed Cat
Puma Future Cat
Ice Cream Shoes
Adicolor Betty Boop
Adicolor Kermit the Frog
Adicolor Miss Piggy
Adicolor Mr Happy
Adicolor Tron
Adicolor Disney Goofy
Adicolor Trimmy Dich
Nike Dunk Shoes
cheap nike dunk
Nike SB
Nike SB Shoes
Nike Dunk SB
Nike Dunk Guns N Roses
Nike Dunk Pushead
Nike Dunk 3 Bears
Nike Dunk Serena Williams
Nike Dunk Tiffany Diamond
Nike Dunk Dr Feelgood
Nike Dunk Send Help
Nike Dunk Santana
Nike Dunk High Unkle
Adicolor Stan Smith G4
Adicolor G4
Adicolor Kermit the Frog G4
Adicolor Mr Happy Y4
Adicolor Y4
Adicolor Stan Smith Y4
Adicolor Stan Smith P4
Adicolor Miss Piggy P4
Adicolor P4
Adicolor Century Low Y3
Adicolo G6 NYC
What The Dunk
Adicolor Kermit the Frog
Adidas Superstar Berlin
Adidas Superstar Boston
Adidas Superstar Buenos Aires
Adidas Superstar London
Adidas Superstar Paris
Adidas Superstar Tokyo
Adidas Superstar New York
Adidas Superstar Red Hot Chili Peppers
Adidas Superstar Bad Boy
Adidas Superstar Ian Brown
Adidas Superstar Missy Elliott
Adidas Superstar Roc-A-Fella
Adidas Superstar Run DMC
Adidas Superstar Underworld/Tomato
Adidas Superstar Upper Playground
Adidas Superstar Expression
Adidas Superstar Andy War
Adidas Superstar Captain
Adidas Superstar Lee Quin
Adidas Superstar Project
Adidas Superstar Walt Disney
Puma Ferrari Trionfo Lo GT II
Puma Ferrari Trionfo
Puma Ferrari Scuderia Trionfo Lo II GT
Puma Ferrari
Nike Shox
Nike Air Max TN
Nike Dunk Low
Nike Dunk High
Nike Air Force 1
Nike Air Max 360
Adidas Adicolor Sneakers
Puma Speed Cat
Puma Future Cat
Ice Cream Shoes
Adicolor Betty Boop
Adicolor Kermit the Frog
Adicolor Miss Piggy
Adicolor Mr Happy
Adicolor Tron
Adicolor Disney Goofy
Adicolor Trimmy Dich
Nike Dunk Shoes
cheap nike dunk
Nike SB
Nike SB Shoes
Nike Dunk SB
Nike Dunk Guns N Roses
Nike Dunk Pushead
Nike Dunk 3 Bears
Nike Dunk Serena Williams
Nike Dunk Tiffany Diamond
Nike Dunk Dr Feelgood
Nike Dunk Send Help
Nike Dunk Santana
Nike Dunk High Unkle
Adicolor Stan Smith G4
Adicolor G4
Adicolor Kermit the Frog G4
Adicolor Mr Happy Y4
Adicolor Y4
Adicolor Stan Smith Y4
Adicolor Stan Smith P4
Adicolor Miss Piggy P4
Adicolor P4
Adicolor Century Low Y3
Adicolo G6 NYC
What The Dunk
Adicolor Kermit the Frog
Adidas Superstar Berlin
Adidas Superstar Boston
Adidas Superstar Buenos Aires
Adidas Superstar London
Adidas Superstar Paris
Adidas Superstar Tokyo
Adidas Superstar New York
Adidas Superstar Red Hot Chili Peppers
Adidas Superstar Bad Boy
Adidas Superstar Ian Brown
Adidas Superstar Missy Elliott
Adidas Superstar Roc-A-Fella
Adidas Superstar Run DMC
Adidas Superstar Underworld/Tomato
Adidas Superstar Upper Playground
Adidas Superstar Expression
Adidas Superstar Andy War
Adidas Superstar Captain
Adidas Superstar Lee Quin
Adidas Superstar Project
Adidas Superstar Walt Disney
Puma Ferrari Trionfo Lo GT II
Puma Ferrari Trionfo
Puma Ferrari Scuderia Trionfo Lo II GT
Puma Ferrari
I'm very excited that Obama win the elect.Obama is a hero!I think he will change US,change the world.He will guide our country out of war.McCain is good but Obama is much better,isn't it? I'd like to know does Obama wear jordan shoes or air force ones?I heard that Obama weared a pair of nike shoes in a dinner,do anybody know it?
Do Obama's daughter wear abercrombie and fitch?We all like abercrombie,aren't we?I'm also wondering did abercrombie & fitch company sponsored Obama.
Michael P.
Best wishes!
Replica Watches,Fake Watches,Replica Watch,Fake Watch,Wholesale Watches,Wholesale Replica Watches,Jewelry Watches,Replica Jewelry Watches.
Thank you very much.As I know,jordans, are refered as michael jordan shoes, Jordans sneakers, they are popular products made by Nike, Inc.air jordan was designed for and endorsed by legendary professional basketball player, Michael Jordan. running shoes.The retro jordan shoes line is created by Jordan Brand, a sub-division of Nike. They are more popular than nike shox, Puma sneakers, puma shoes, Basketball sneakers, basketball shoes, nike air force (Also known as air force ones) and nike air max. Since its first release in 1984, there have been new designs of the air jordans released each year, even after Jordan retired from basketball.Of caurse,these are hotter than bapes.
We wholesale portable speakers,
Mobile Phone Speakers
cellphone speakers
celluar phone speakers
mini speakers wholesale,
wholesale ipod speakers,
Portable Mp3 Speaker,
Portable Speakers System,
Usb Speakers,
Ipod Speakesrs,
apple Speakers,
Ipod Portable Speakers,
Mp4 Speaker,
Computer Speaker , Ipod Dock speakers!
Lego ipod speakers
Brick ipod speakers
lego brick ipod speaker
Brick Iphone speaker