O2

Esquire PT Anderson Profile Finally Available For Lunchtime Reading

<i>Esquire</i> PT Anderson Profile Finally Available For Lunchtime Reading
Getty Images

Looking for something to read during your lunch hour? Check out Esquire's recent profile about our favorite enfant terrible, director Paul Thomas Anderson. The article, which appeared in the print edition of the magazine last month, finally popped online within the last week, and since we don't know anyone who actually buys Esquire, we're guessing you haven't seen it, either.

There isn't really a whole lot of new ground traversed in the piece, as the only people interviewed are former high school friends and acquaintances of Mr. Anderson, who haven't heard from the director in years. Needless to say, their judgment about the man might be a little slanted. The one thing everyone seems to agree on is that Mr. Anderson was a childhood prodigy when it came to filmmaking. For example, he directed The Dirk Diggler Story, which in essence became Boggie Nights, during his senior year of high school. Mr. Anderson was also very fond of filming his father, Ernie Anderson (a television personality who sounds a little like Phillip Baker Hall's character in Magnolia) and his father's pals, actors Robert Ridgley and Tim Conway, hanging out and drinking, which we can only imagine has to be hilarious footage (PTA, please make that a DVD extra someday!).

Still, our favorite part comes during a description of the director's famed two-day stint at NYU film school. To quote the article, Mr. Anderson quit "because one professor dissed Terminator 2 and another gave him a 'C' for a prose sample that was actually written by David Mamet." We don't know what's funnier: that Paul Thomas Anderson handed in something written by David Mamet or that the NYU teacher didn't know it was written by David Mamet. Whoops!

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

Anonymous (not verified) says:

So, basically, the point of this post is to bring to people's attention the appearance on the web of a story you don't think is really worth people's attention. Wow. Good use of your time! But, hey, at least you got off a shot at Esquire, which one presumes was *really* the point here.

As it happens, I know 10 times more people who buy Esquire than are aware the Observer exists, but maybe I don't spend enough time flexing my snideness among the up-and-coming media elite.

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.