The Politicker

Bloomberg Defends Nonprofit-Vetting Process

At his press conference in midtown yesterday Michael Bloomberg was asked why one city agency approved a funding application for the Donna Reid Fund after the same group had been denied funding by another agency.

The mayor defended what had happened and added, "In fact, the process worked."

 

Two employees of Councilman Kendall Stewart have now been accused of skimming money off the grants the nonprofit received.

UPDATE: Councilman David Yassky's office released a letter this morning in support of the actions of the first agency to see an application from the Donna Reid Foundation--the Department for the Aging--expressing support and commending the agency for taking the right course of action. In recent days, D.F.T.A. has been blamed for not doing more to expose inconsistencies in the nonprofit's application.

Here's the letter:

Hon. Edwin Mendéz-Santiago

 

Commissioner, New York City Department for the Aging

2 Lafayette Street

New York, NY 10007

April 18, 2008

Dear Commissioner Mendéz-Santiago:

I wish to commend the Department for the Aging for discovering and bringing to light the recent fraud perpetrated on New York City taxpayers.

All of us in City government have been shocked and outraged to learn of the flagrant misuse of public funds that led to Wednesday’s indictment of two City Council staff members. This shameful episode has underscored the need for increased transparency in the budget process at a time when the current system has clearly failed us.

According to newspaper reports, it was your department that first recognized the alleged inappropriate allocation of funds to the now debunked Donna Reid Foundation and reported it to the Department of Investigation. In doing so, you and your staff performed a critically important service for all New Yorkers.

I commend your actions, and I hope that all employees involved in uncovering this indefensible scam will be appropriately commended for their efforts. Thank you for your diligence.

 

Sincerely,

David Yassky

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

Anonymous (not verified) says:

The fact is that the City's contracting process is a scandal waiting to happen. There is no oversight since the Board of Estimate was abolished. Fritz Schartz and the Charter Revision Committee decided to vest all contracting power in the Mayor and only offer the Comptroller a ministerial registration power. The Council has avoided registration although it would have at least provided them some cover had those contracts been registered by the Comptroller's office. Even more troublesome than the Council's contracting is the fact that the Mayor has turned government into a corporate enterprise and has city agencies letting large contracts to agency corporations who then dole out funds as they please with no oversight or transparency. Bloomberg likes to pretend his government is transparent. That is far from the truth. Giuliani started the trend of hiding the City's contracts but Bloomberg has perfected it. Bottom line....Quinn's error is chump change in the scheme of things.

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.