Style

Memo to Walsh: Our Demands Are Small

Memo to Walsh: Our Demands Are Small
Getty Images

The New York Knicks’ decision to hire longtime Pacers’ executive Donnie Walsh to run basketball operations should fill Knicks fans with a mixture of excitement and apprehension.

Fortunately, the team has nowhere to go but up, and the fan base’s wish list is likely smaller than it has ever been. No demands for a championship. Basketball that is merely watchable will be a cause for celebration.

Walsh brings an undeniable record of success with him—while Indiana has not won an NBA title, the Pacers have been to the playoffs all but two seasons with Walsh in the front office since 1989-90.

He starts with one strike against him, however: it was Walsh who gave Isiah Thomas the head coaching gig in Indiana back in 2000.

That said, there’s a pretty simple checklist Walsh can follow to turn the Knicks around.

Fire Isiah

It is fair to wonder if Isiah Thomas knows that each time he discusses his job, he sounds like a horror-movie villain—and that his Knicks are the horror show.

"If there's one thing you can be sure of, I'll never quit and I'll keep coming back,” Thomas told the Bergen Record Monday. "You've got to kill me because I'm never stopping."

Unfortunately, that determination simply doesn’t translate in any form to the players Isiah coaches. Most of the roster displays an aversion to defensive effort. Offensive plays are haphazardly run—the Knicks are comically inept on plays run out of a timeout, just seconds after Isiah has drawn something up. And even those players handpicked by Thomas can’t get along with him (see Marbury, Stephon). It’s hard to believe new personnel will like him more.

Also: a new coach is unlikely to cost the franchise more than $11 million due to sexual harassment.

No one epitomizes the culture of losing in New York more than Thomas. And if Walsh keeps Thomas on, it is a tacit endorsement for part of the unbearable basketball played at Madison Square Garden since the end of the Patrick Ewing era.

Rebuild, Don’t Retool

The great irony of the current mess is that it stemmed from a belief that New York fans would not tolerate rebuilding. It isn’t clear where this idea came from, but in a league with a salary cap, using this as a guiding principle has led to disaster upon disaster. No other team needed to fear bestowing a long-term contract on a potential problem—after all, when that player wore out his welcome, he could just be dumped on the Knicks.

Allowing large contracts to expire, or be dealt in their final year for draft picks, is the most direct path to making the Knicks younger and able to dip below the salary cap. No longer will New York be trading from a position of weakness. In fact, should the draft lottery go New York’s way this year, the team could be in position to add a young star worth building around, such as Memphis guard Derrick Rose.

Keep David Lee—at the right price

The one player who has managed to earn the affection of New York is Lee, whose rebounding and intensity seemed to clash with the other Knicks’ pursuits. Of course, Lee was promptly benched this season when Zach Randolph became available. The Knicks preferred to go with Eddy Curry in the lineup, whose aversion to rebounding suggests to a basketball phobia.

But with Lee hitting free agency this year, it will be important not to throw anything approaching max-contract money at Lee. He is a very good player, but he is not someone to build a franchise around. Pay too much for Lee now, and getting a free agent like LeBron James is 2010 may become impossible.

Clean House

Everyone else needs to go. This doesn’t need to be done tomorrow, though some players are so poisonous that they should be paid to stay away from the team, then dealt when their contract reaches its final year. (See once again Marbury, Stephon.) Others, like Curry, could have value to a team that needs low-post scoring, but has other players who play defense and rebound. Do not be afraid to deal Curry for draft picks. Same with Jamal Crawford, a good seventh man on a championship team who is the overpaid scoring leader for the Knicks.

But don’t deal them for other veteran problems. Knicks fans will trade big names for even minimal effort. And please, end the Isiah Thomas era, before he kills again.

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

Juan (not verified) says:

Y'all drove Pat Riley out of town in 1995, that was your biggest mistake. How are you gonna get rid of Riley as your coach??

Brian McNamara (not verified) says:

How about just letting the air out of this team gradually? No more signings, no more trades, just draft players, and let contracts expire. In 2010, the Knicks would then have room for LeBron James. Nine players come off the cap between now and then, and they have six draft picks in the intervening 3 drafts. Fill six of nine slots that way, resign David Lee to a REASONABLE deal, and sign two players to lower level exceptions or mid-level deals at the most... Short deals, for role playing defender/rebounders would be best. This will have to be Zach's team until then. Zach starts and Eddy becomes your off the bench scorer.

It seems to me that over that stretch the Knicks should be bad enough to pick up two or three more nice players with high draft picks. That would help attract LeBron to town. There is nobody that the Knicks can get via trade that would have that kind of long term effect. If the Knicks fold it in for the next 2 years, but the don't make any more dumb signings or trades, they could actually even start to be halfway to decent by 2010 just on draft picks alone.

Drain the swamp. Knicks fans will wait. No more quick fixes.

DavidK (not verified) says:

David Lee is NOT a free agent this summer, he is under contract for 2 more years

Brian McNamara (not verified) says:

Yeah, that's why I was speaking about actions that need to take place over the next THREE years. Also, he is NOT under contract for two years. He is under contract for one year, then has a qualifying offer of about 2 million to keep him as a restricted free agent. The way to do it is to read what I wrote first, then react to it. If you did that, you might have realized that I knew what I was talking about. Then you might not have written a comment that shows that you don't.

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.