The Politicker

Rich Baum's Statement, Spitzer's 'Red Hot Poker' Denial

by Katharine Jose  |  July 24, 2008
|  Tags:

John Riley tries to figure out why Eliot Spitzer wasn't charged in the Troopergate probe, although four others were. [Spin Cycle]

In testimony to the state Commission in Public Integrity, Spitzer denied that he made the infamous "red-hot poker" comment. [Politics on the Hudson]

According to Liz Benjamin, Rich Baum, in a public statement, will "agree that he did something wrong, but not that he did it on purpose." [Daily Politics]

The judge that was looking into Joe Bruno's outside business activities just got appointed to the federal bench. [Daily News]

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.