Quinn Proposes Changes, Faces Questions
Christine Quinn just finished an hour-long press conference where she said she’ll create an independent monitor to oversee how her office allocates money, but faced an onslaught of questions about these and other changes were being made now, and not when she discovered improper financial dealings at the Council late last year. The improper practices were made public earlier this month.
Quinn told reporters today that she felt it was more important to bring the wrongdoing to the attention of the authorities, who are now looking into the matter.
“I have not done this job perfectly -- I will not do this job perfectly,” said Quinn at City Hall, where she was joined at the event by good-government activists Dick Dadey of Citizens Union and Gene Russianoff of N.Y.P.I.R.G. and several Council members.
In describing more of the “historic" financial reforms, Quinn also said she’ll create a searchable database of all funding requests made my City Council members, and the portion of the budget that deals with those requests, called Schedule C’s, will be made available 24 before they’re voted on.
Quinn also said the mid-year budget requests, which normally arise after mistakes and omissions in the budget are discovered, will now be voted on by the entire finance committee and, later, by the full council.
Quinn declined to say how the previous budget process broke down, or who was to blame for it. She also declined to give herself a grade as a reformer, saying, “I’m not going to grade myself mid-test.”
On the last question of the 58-minute press conference, where she was asked to clarify whether she alerted the mayor’s office, Quinn said, “At different points of the process when we felt different city entities needed to be made aware, we made them aware.”
UPDATE: Councilman John Liu reacts negatively:
"These so-called reforms are nothing more than back-pedaling that unfortunately weakens the Council as a legislative counter-balance to the executive branch of government. It's amazing how naked ambition to the mayoralty can result in the leader of the legislative body becoming the body's own worst enemy. It's fine for Speaker Quinn to try and fix things in her own administration, but don't tie the hands of future Councils.
"If you get caught with your hands in the cookie jar, just let go of the cookies and remove your hand, and maybe give yourself a slap on the wrist. But do not tie the hands of all the successors."

















Good for her. Now if she would just get rid of money the Councilman give out to community based groups and make them compete for RFP's to.
The council should vote the speaker out of office. Her leadership has brought shame to the entire city council and its members. It is especially poor judgement and poor taste to lay blame on her staff, when she is the chief. This reflects very badly on someone who holds a leadership position. If she can't manage her own staff, how can she be speaker? The money of the people is being used like her private stash to win support and keep her members in line. She's definitely using it as ante for her mayoral bid. At our expense! The public is outraged. We demand for her resignation. I agree totally with what John Liu said.
This is a terrible idea. I have never been a fan of John Liu, but he is absolutely correct here - she is significantly weakening the Council as an institution of government. The mayor's office consistently stonewalls any attempt at getting any information on their decisionmaking process (to the point of fighting FOIL requests), and she is sacrificing the Council as a body in what will be a vain attempt at moving to the other side of City Hall.
Bravo, John Liu! With Quinn as speaker, we have no city council, just a mayor and a chief secretary.
All of the bloggers are correct.. Quinn has significantly weakened the Councils ability to be a counterbalance to the Mayor... I echo all New Yorkers calls to have Ms Quinn resign. She is a fake reformer and a self serving individual.
can council members call a vote to elect a new speaker? it appears that if anyone knew about the slush fund, it was the speaker and other council members (except perhaps Weprin and other top budget negotiators) knew that the Quinn was stashing millions out of their sight into fake organizations.
Can council members call a vote to elect a new speaker?
If anyone knew about the slush fund, it was the speaker. Other council members (except perhaps Weprin anda few other members) didn't know that Quinn was stashing millions out of their sight and into fake organizations.
Quinn's next reforms are to have the Mayor's Law Department review all legislation introduced at the Council and to have City Planning review all Council land use decisions.