A Bowery Veteran Hangs On
Is longtime resident Roberta Degnore crusading—or cashing in?

When Roberta Degnore moved to the Bowery some 30 years ago, there were no ritzy hotels, expensive condos, or Whole Foods; no moms with baby carriages or yuppies walking their dogs.
But there were plenty of prostitutes turning tricks on the corner and bums who would use her doorstep as a toilet, and you would more likely see rats on the sidewalk than copies of The New York Times.
“It was all focused on the arts scene,” said Ms. Degnore, a petite filmmaker and psychologist with wavy red hair and cat-eye glasses, sitting in her spacious, rent-stabilized loft near the intersection with Delancey Street. “No one had any money back then. Everyone was just doing art because they loved it, and we gave each other respect because of that.”
But the more the Bowery gentrifies, the less room there is for people like Ms. Degnore.
Her landlord just sold for $7.55 million the five-story walk-up where she’s lived since 1980 in a 1,400-square-foot loft with a 25-by-22-foot terrace, for which she now pays around $1,300 a month. The apparent buyer is Brack Capital, a bullish global real estate firm whose New York portfolio includes an array of towering luxury hotels, condos and office buildings. Brack has closed on three adjacent properties, including a four-story walk-up at 189 Bowery that it bought in November of 2007 for $9.7 million, almost $5.5 million more than the same building sold for in July of 2006. There have been rumors the company wants to build a large hotel there, but an employee in Brack’s Manhattan office declined to comment on the company’s plans for the properties, and calls to managers handling its Bowery project were not returned.
Earlier this year, the other tenants in Ms. Degnore’s building, who were all on market-rate leases, were bought out in deals negotiated by Robert A. Cohen & Associates, a real estate investment and property management company that appears to be involved in the sale. Ms. Degnore said she has repeatedly declined buyout offers, and Mr. Cohen declined to comment for this article.
Now, Ms. Degnore and her dog, a 14-year-old Lab named Patsy, are the building’s sole occupants (“it’s a very creepy feeling”), but she said she won’t give up her digs: “I refuse to be forced out by developers.”
SINCE THE LATE '90s, the Bowery has been undergoing a vast luxury transformation. It’s evident in the massive hotels that have started to line the avenue from Canal Street, where the 18-story Wyndham is being built, all the way up to Sixth Street, where the 22-story Cooper Square Hotel is nearing completion; in the shiny New Museum of Contemporary Art, which looms like a giant robot above the weathered old buildings that flank it; in the neighborhood’s plethora of trendy bars; in the John Varvatos boutique that opened where the legendary CBGB used to be; and in a new Chase bank up the street, where it costs $3 to use the A.T.M.
For better or for worse, developers are capitalizing on skid row’s legacy of art and alcoholism—grime is what gave the Bowery its character, and character is what makes it a cool place to be.
But longtime residents like Ms. Degnore still can’t believe that a street once dominated by flophouses, winos and eccentrics is becoming a luxury destination.
A Detroit native, Ms. Degnore came to Manhattan in 1972 in her early 20s. Her first apartment, a split-level studio with lots of windows, was on 15th Street in a newly renovated brownstone just west of Eighth Avenue. She can’t remember exactly how much the rent was, but she said it must have been “next to nothing, 200 bucks or something.”
Over the next few years, she bounced around among various apartments in Lower Manhattan, finally moving by January of 1980 to her loft on the Bowery, which she said has been an ideal setting for creative endeavors—screenplays, novels and several short films, including an experimental documentary about the art of glass blowing that’s more reminiscent of Kenneth Anger than it is the Discovery Channel.
The day she moved in was cold and snowy, but the loft had a working fireplace at the time. So the first thing she did after lugging up all her stuff up was buy some bundles of wood from a guy selling them out of his pickup truck, get a fire going, and invite over her friend Sam Wagstaff, Robert Mapplethorpe’s mentor and companion, who died of AIDS in 1987. They sat around for hours smoking cigarettes, she recalled. Next Page >




















Hang in there Roberta!
If she had any forsight or guts she would have bought the place 30 years ago and been able to stay. I have little empathy for those who sailed through life in a rent controlled apartments so they could fulfill there dreams of being artists and filmakers and then complain about it. While the rest of us work our butts off to make ends meet so maybe in our retirements we can be artists.
You go girl! You paid your dues and you're entitled to live the way you chose.
It is so disheartening that the world has come to believe that "newer is better" "bigger is better" what about maintaining and enjoying the existing environment.
Hang in there
slurps and licks to Patsy from Chappy and Snow
Sandi
Yeah, no sympathy here either. I mean because she moved in 30 years ago and braved the new world - this entitles her? hardly.
This sounds like a job for that "journalist" Chris Shott. Observer probably got smart and fired him. Good riddance.
She's got a crazy sense of entitlement just like many rent-stabilized tenants do. Just because you have been renting a space for 30 years doesn't mean you own it. So you certainly shouldn't expect to receive a market price like you sold it yourself. The landlord has been hurt enough by her below market rents, and she has reaped a much larger benefit to date than she should have for moving to an area that she obviously liked due to her artistic preferences.
hey, all you new manhattan residents from the midwest, this could be you in 30 years! keep paying your rent, pursuing creative endeavors, and living only with your dog, and after a few decades of not really making anything of yourself and not thinking of the future you too can have an article written about you that falsely labels you as some sort of courageous hold-out , fighting against the big, evil developers.
boo hoo hoo. to live in a rent-stabilized apartment in the center of new york for 30 years is a privilege she was fortunate enough to have. try to find nearly anyone in any major metropolis area in any part of the world who has not been greatly affected by some kind of surrounding urban chance for an entire three decades.
living in a city is a compromise, and to not take a 3/4 mil offer for a place you don't even own is just absurd. i have absolutely no sympathy for people like this. i mean, she's not even that old. this would be a somewhat different story if she was a disabled 80 year old.
and lastly, she's lived in that place for 30 years and it still looks like that?!
Whether you are sympathetic or not to this individuals situation is not the point. Whether you are transient here or a long term resident you count on someone, if not yourself, to make this home. Length of stay isn’t necessarily the determining factor. Treating this as a neighborhood you are a part of is.
People have a right to home and a responsibility to community. A society relies on it. You rely on it. Owning or renting isn’t the criteria either. All parties entered into rent-stabilized agreements understanding what they meant. When no one else would rent landlords were thrilled to have any tenant at any rent rate. They gained. Now that those spaces are more valuable, landlords aren’t “entitled” to bigger profits. They made the deal they made or bought places that were already contracted for the rent they generated.
Some of us want to stand with neighbors like Roberta, but is in everyone’s best interest to build and sustain a neighborhood that cares for its people, that cares for you.
I find it very interesting that all those bold enough to post derisive comments about roberta &/or her situation have to cloak themselves in the 'anonymous' shroud! not wanting to be visible behind pathetically distorted, self-absorbed sentiments?!!
being a pioneer in any area is tough enough-to help make it a community deserves credit. this is not a monetary issue, but one of home and roots.
DON'T YOU DENSE FOLK GET IT ????????!!!!!!!!!
To all those unsympathetic respondents who feel that the dramatic changes to the Bowery are just fine have totally missed the point. Zoning can be implemented that is sensitive to the character and history of a community. Otherwise, if protections aren't in place, the community is obliterated and gentrification is the norm. The end result is the sterility of midtown. This is the attitude that prevailed when Pennsylvania Station was demolished in the name of progress. Only later did the "powers that be" realize that a disastrous mistake had been made. If you will also remember there was a push to demolish Grand Central Station, but, as a result of strong opposition, the station was saved and is now a beloved building. Once the character and history of a community have been razed, the loss is irretrievable. If you want upscale and gentrification, there are areas of New York City that will accommodate your interests. Don't inflict your lifestyle on our communities.
"m. campo" is hardly a brave attempt at letting your identity be known and matched with your comment. you're still anonymous. unless people start posting their email addresses or full names, your comment is null.
Anonymous 7/20: Why didn't you sign you name? If you say M. Campo's comment is null, then yours is equally if not more meaningless. Don't you have better things to do with your time than nitpick? You probably submitted one of those ridiculous anonymous statements supporting gentrification and overdevelopment. Maybe you'd even like a few nice, big box stores like Walmarts in our community. Get a life!
And you probably think Bush is doing a terrific job and should be president for life.
The above comment was meant for all the Anonymous respondents. After all, Bush thought Brownie was doing a terrific job while thousands were drowning in New Orleans. Who cares if people lose their homes?
haha!
damn, you people are hilarious. all of you!
m. campo, sandy, rose, jean, you crack me up! your earnestness is so palpable!
who cares if the anonymous people didn't sign their name. i'm not signing mine either!
and that doesn't mean i voted for bush! he's a fucking idiot!
thank you! thank you! good night and good luck!
Anonymous and loving it! I don't know whether or not you live in this community, but you'd be earnest too, and maybe a little bit more, if you were witnessing the destruction of your community and all that you hold dear. Hilarity is not one of the emotions I would ascribe to the wholesale decimation of a historic neighborhood such as the Bowery. You probably thought the demolition of Penn Station was a hoot.