Sweet on Obama!
Or not? Chicago Sun-Times’ Washington bureau chief Lynn Sweet remembers Barack when he was just a Chicago-style brat (get it?)

MORE
Off the Record
At some point in 1999, Barack Obama, then a young and virtually unknown Illinois state senator, was considering running for a seat in the House of Representatives representing Illinois’ First Congressional District—which includes parts of the South Side of Chicago and some southern suburbs—against longtime incumbent Bobby Rush.
So on a visit to Washington, D.C., he stopped in at the office of Lynn Sweet, the Washington bureau chief for the Chicago Sun-Times.
It’s what everyone does when they’re in a tough race: introduce themselves to Ms. Sweet, who since 1993 has been the voice of Washington politics for the Chicago tabloid.
“When he walked in, the first thing he did was hand me this book,” said Ms. Sweet, as she settled down into a seat at Morty’s, a Washington delicatessen, for a toasted onion bagel and a Dr. Brown’s diet black cherry soda. “He walked into my office in the Press Club with his aide Dan Shomon and he hands me his book and says, ‘This is my story.’ And I said, ‘Oooh. Okay?’”
Mr. Obama gave her a copy of Dreams from My Father, his 1995 memoir, which Ms. Sweet had no idea he had written. Ms. Sweet, who turned 57 years last week, made a crooked face.
“Probably if you saw me, you would have seen me raise—it was a silent huh? It was a silent huh. If you could hear me say, silently, huh, it raised a huh for me.” She looked like she had swallowed a few lemon slices.
“The huh is, he’s 40-something and he’s written his memoir already? I wasn’t aware of the whole story line, though; I just thought he had a memoir. I did not know that much about his life. We just met a few hours ago. If the first thing you did was say, ‘Lynn, here’s my memoir,’ I would say ‘Ooookay?’”
He was unlikely to unseat Mr. Rush (he didn’t, in fact), so she shelved the book and forgot about it. “In hindsight, I wish I had gotten the book a week beforehand. But who knew? Who knew at the time?”
She didn’t start leafing through it until June 2004, the same summer Mr. Obama was well on his way to his Senate seat and delivered his famous speech at the Democratic National Convention.
The book was an instant hit when it was re-released that year, when Ms. Sweet finally got around to reading it.
“Composite characters. Changed names. And reams of dialogue between Obama and other people that moves the narrative along but is an ‘approximation’ of the actual conversation,” she wrote in the Sun-Times. “Except for public figures and his family, it is impossible to know who is real and who is not.”
HILDY JOHNSON MEETS BEN SMITH
Ms. Sweet is not the person to think of if you think of the reporters that people like to say have given in to Barack Obama’s charms. Nor does she have an axe to grind. She is not a pledged foe of Mr. Obama the way some reporters for hometown papers become when the people they have covered emerge from their backyard to become national figures.
But even other reporters who follow her around say she’s the first to call “bullshit.”
“I don’t write a story saying how Obama came out of the rough-and-tumble of Chicago politics,” she said, quietly and forcefully in her Chicago accent—she’s lived there nearly 40 years. “Because in my experience, he was able to avoid the rough-and-tumble of Chicago politics. Au contraire! He didn’t come up through the system.”
She was now speaking from the same office where Mr. Obama had met her nine or so years before, and I suspect it hasn’t much changed since then. It’s full of memorabilia from her days from Chicago: Sun-Times baseball caps; a framed gag license plate that reads ‘SCOOP,’ accompanied by a laudatory note from then Illinois Secretary of State George Ryan, who later became governor and after a recent conviction for corruption is serving a six-year prison sentence. On the wall is a road sign indicating the Lincoln Park West neighborhood where she used to live. A broken computer sat in front of her with a sheet of paper taped to its side reading, “Shut the fuck up and type.”
“Obama came in and had a very lucky break to come in in 90-something, make some of the right connections, and have an opening,” she said. “He returned to Chicago and worked with a law firm that gave him a lot of political network advantages, and started looking around for some office to run for, found this opening in the State Senate where he put himself in it. Now that’s not coming through the rough-and-tough of Chicago politics. And then once he knocked his opponent off the ballot, he represented a safe Democratic district, and that if he chose to, he could have represented until he stopped working. O.K.?” Next Page >
















The notion that the press isn't holding Barack Obama accountable is nonsense. For the most part, Obama coverage actually falls into two camps: One amounts to an all-out attack, demanding he repudiate his supporters, his position on diplomacy and taxes, his heritage and almost everything else; the other camp simply ignores his positions on the issues and lazily suggests he's nothing more than an eloquent speaker (and then this camp accuses him of plagiarism for good measure)
I read her stuff for a while but gave up. Sweet's columns on Obama are usually snide. There's a constant undertone of trying to cut him down to size. Maybe she could take Mayhill Fowler on as an intern.
P.S. Isn't the Sun-Times a Murdoch-owned paper?
Critical Reader is seriously behind the times: Murdoch sold the Sun-Times nearly a quarter century ago.
Critical Reader is seriously behind the times: Murdoch sold the Sun-Times nearly a quarter century ago.
I have followed Lynn for years, working on Barack's campaign very early for the US Senate. Now the national stage of the man she has covered has given her a big head. She's not the story, and the fact that she's participated in an article about her is a disgrace to all journalists. I've watched her lose all sense of credibility, and this silly article is the icing on the cake.
Lynn, I'm ashamed of you! Even other sleazy tabloid journalists are smart enough to stay out of the story themselves. You're like Einstein's maid taking credit for the Theory of Relativity. Pathetic.
Lynn Sweet is a great reporter. I have four newspapers on my doorstop every morning, both chicago papers and the NYT and the WSJ, and I--and my husband--both reach first for the Sun-Times and once I get my hands on the tabloid, I go first to read Lynn Sweet.
I've watched this hack (and a few others) on every cable show going down the pike. I channel surf to get away from her but there she is yapping on another channel. She's far from fair and seems a tad jealous of her subject..like most of them these days. Who are reporters to annoint or rebuff? Elections are for the people... not for the press to decide. I'm glad to see she's getting hers in "comment" print! Ha!
If YOMAMA had lighter skin, he would have been laughed out of the race months ago. He speaks very eloquently and doesn't say a damned thing. This guy is more full of shit than his disgusting spiritual leader-the Rev WRONG, and that bitch he's married to--that has never been proud of her country. Let them both go back to Africa and watch witches being burned alive, by their families. If that's the heritage and the spirit of the Afro-centric church they go to, than we are in serious shit if he's elected to anything more than dogcatcher.
Lynn is a lame reporter and a mediocre analyst at best. I've had no respect for her since she called Paul Tsongas a little Teddy Bear in a debate in which she attacked Bill Clinton in 1992. Nothing she's done this year has shown that she is anything other than a hack of limited intelligence.
But I just have to respond to "Joel Goodman". What a racist ass on every conceivable level. It's always disappointing when you see that people like this actually exist. Ugh.
Joel is, for the most part, merely pointing out some unpleasant facts in an unpleasant way.
Lynn Sweet is one of the only reporters to actually ask Obambi any tough questions...
Don't worry Lynn you will be vindicated when the Obama house of cards comes tumbling down ;-)
I have followed all your reports and you have been nothing but fair, unbiased and professional.
Keep up the good work. You're one of the very few who has the guts to ask the questions that everyone should be asking.
Interesting math you're using, Neil Steinberg. Maybe the Clinton campaign could put you to work on their popular vote count.
According to a newfangled thing called Google, Murdoch sold the Sun Times in 1994, not "a quarter century ago."
In any case, isn't the Sun Times pretty much of a rag, regardless of who owns it?