The Touchable

How 'Times' Got That Story—Rashbaum’s Tip, Sexton’s Team Hits Jackpot

This article was published in the March 12, 2008, edition of The New York Observer.

Not even Spitzer himself could scoop <br />the metro desk.
Getty Images
Not even Spitzer himself could scoop
the metro desk.

MORE
Off the Record

At 2 p.m. on March 10, The New York Times published a story on its Web site reporting that Governor Eliot Spitzer had been named in connection with a federal investigation into a prostitution ring.

And the story belonged, unequivocally, to the Cinderella section of the Times newsroom, the Metro desk. Joe Sexton, editor of the section since 2006, was finally getting to try on the glass slipper: The Spitzer story was arguably the biggest scoop in a year at The Times, and was certainly the biggest story of Joe Sexton’s reign at Metro.

Managing editor Jill Abramson was not shy about handing out the laurels in an interview the next day.

“Metro was the absolute center of gravity on this story,” she said. “I see it at the nexus of news and investigative reporting, something which Joe and the Metro desk have excelled at.”

But part of the reason there is so much excitement on Eighth Avenue right now is that the Metro desk has had a hard time finding its direction. Mr. Sexton is in love with the blood-and-guts reporting of a city paper, the kind of paper the stentorian and increasingly nationally focused Times has, for decades now, had some trouble impersonating; at the same time, according to several sources, Mr. Sexton has been under pressure to commission more lifestyle features and to soften its hard-news focus, with bigger, wider photos on the front page. Two reporters from non-newspaper backgrounds have been hired into the section within the last year and a half: Susan Dominus and Eric Konigsberg.

But for the last few days, at least, Metro’s mission has been crystal clear.

According to two people involved in the story, it started on Friday, March 7, when William Rashbaum, a reporter of the old school whose outgoing message refers telephone callers to a pager number, got a tip. The nine-year veteran of the paper’s courts and investigations desks was holding a complaint detailing the arrest of four people associated with a prostitution ring; information in the documents told the story of a john in Room 871 at a hotel somewhere in Washington.

They knew from the tip that Client 9, as the court documents called him, was a “New York official,” one source familiar with the investigation said.

But which one? And what Washington hotel has a Room 871?

Reporters were given specialized missions to help narrow down the identity of the subject they were after.

“It was a real nibble” of information most reporters outside of the core group got in the first hours of reporting, the source said.

But as Friday wore on, the investigative team became convinced this was a real story, and that Client 9 could be Eliot Spitzer.

The Times, in its own account printed Tuesday, said the reporting had started on Friday and that inquiries to the governor began “over the weekend and on Monday,” and that the governor had canceled his public schedule on Monday.

In the building, there was a sense that something was going on. “You knew something was up,” said one staffer present over the weekend who wasn’t let in on the secret.

Ms. Abramson was there late Friday night and much of the weekend, and Mr. Sexton and Metro political editor Carolyn Ryan barely seemed to leave.

“We were very much here,” said Ms. Abramson. “Very late. I talked to Joe all the time—all weekend.” On Sunday, Mr. Sexton, who only rarely makes appearances in the office over the weekend, was quietly shuffling small groups into the “crying rooms,” little conference rooms where reporters and editors go for privacy, along with Ms. Ryan and Metro investigations editors Kevin Flynn and Matthew Purdy and Albany bureau chief Danny Hakim, who made an even rarer weekend appearance in the Eighth Avenue newsroom.

After the saga surrounding the months-delayed publication of the John McCain-lobbyist story, a story that was written about before The Times even published it and that ended with a whimper amid a cloud of public opprobrium (and that, in the end, was a tie with The Washington Post), one person involved with the story said the biggest fear, by far, was that they’d lose it.

No Spitzer story appeared on the Sunday “sked”—the lineup of stories sent out to the Metro staff to let them know what was in the hopper for Monday papers.

“There was an extreme effort” to keep it quiet, said one person involved with the story. Next Page >

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

Tom (not verified) says:

One word - PULITZER

Mr. Dictaphone (not verified) says:

Koblin reports above "William Rashbaum, a reporter of the old school whose outgoing message refers telephone callers to a pager number, got a tip. The nine-year veteran of the paper’s courts and investigations desks was holding a complaint detailing the arrest of four people associated with a prostitution ring; information in the documents told the story of a john in Room 871 at a hotel somewhere in Washington.

They knew from the tip that Client 9, as the court documents called him, was a “New York official,” one source familiar with the investigation said."

But did anybody at The Times vet the source of the "tip" to determine the purpose of leaking the information to the New York Times? Isn't it obvious that the leak was intended to bring down Eliot Spitzer? And isn't that a central aspect of the story? I'm sorry, but here we go again. Remember Judith Miller taking dictation? And going to jail to "protect her sources", or something? Was Rashburn suspicious of motive? Was anyone at The Times? Or was this an unnecessary rush to publish by telling would could very well be half the story?

Anonymous (not verified) says:

They can cover the governor on a tip.

But NYT still gets beat to a pulp covering the NYPD, real estate corruption, and labor issues in NYC.

There's a reason the paper is losing advertising - they don't respect their core market. We don't even have Metro briefs anymore.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

It doesn't matter who the tipster was, or motivation, if the information proves accurate. It did.

It's not at all like Judith Miller and the government manipulating her to start a war or expose a CIA agent. The agent did nothing wrong. This is alledged criminal wrong doing of the most salacious kind on the part of a governor who sneered at such criminals.

Again, it doesn't matter a bit who revealed it first. It was coming out anyway.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

Intent does matter, and that's where one would expect the Times to be more perceptive and nuanced in their reporting. Certainly, the Daily News and the Post know exactly what to do with that information (print it immediately) but the Times, hopefully, should be thinking, let's see, why would the feds be scanning the governor's bank account for relatively small transactions? Who in the federal government might want Spitzer humiliated? What purpose might that serve? With the Dept. of Justice already under criticism for jailing a Democratic governor on ambiguous evidence, is this more of the same?

I'm still shocked that anyone with Spitzer's experience would flout the Mann Act, and what he did was reckless and stupid, but the rush to judgment that he has no alternative but to resign seems hasty to me.

The Metro section seems to be loosing its focus, and I think it's a huge mistake to walk away from reporting the gritty texture of New York City, but the Times shouldn't be in the tabloid business either. The best reporting involves some critical thinking, and that's what's missing here.

Anonymous mm (not verified) says:

The Times had to run the story. Any newspaper worth its salt would have. Now it's time for them to investigate the motives of the leakers and run stories about that too. Obviously they have to protect the name of their source. But they don't have to protect the whole "leaking machine" behind that source. Times readers are smart and they are already asking questions. The Times needs to address those questions.

Tony V (not verified) says:

I love how these "investigative" reporters and editors pat themselves on the back for one huge scoop. So is that supposed to erase the months of corner cutting, character assassination, and shoddy reporting that this paper has been engaging in? Talk about low standards. Your ecstacy over this ONE story tells it all.

REAL reporters can say, "It's just my job." because they've "been there, done that."

MATT DRUDGE makes all these reporters look like Journalism students (pulling a B- at best), and now all of a sudden they're all back in the 60's and these guys are Woodward and Bernstein?

GIVE ME A BREAK. Show me a couple of years of consistency, NYTimes, and I'll start trusting your yellow paper again.

Tony Viardo
Chicago, IL

Anonymous (not verified) says:

It's obvious Spitzer was deliberately outted and taken down by those who would rather not have a Democrat bent on reform in the governor's mansion in New York. But newspapers are in the news business and no newspaper worth its ink could sit on this story while investigating the motives of the leakers. Now is the time for the paper to put its best reporters on the trail of the larger story: Why were the feds snooping around his personal transactions? How did this information get leaked to the press? ETC.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

It certainly has to be possible that the leak wasn't from a political enemy trying to bring him down, but rather from someone who was distrurbed by the governor's hypocrisy. The governor brought down himself.

butterflysoup (not verified) says:

Yeah, someone at the federal level was trying to bring him down. Yeah, he was a hypocrite. Instant karma, dudes.

butterflysoup (not verified) says:

Yeah, someone at the federal level was trying to bring him down. Yeah, he was a hypocrite. Instant karma, dudes.

Charles (not verified) says:

"There's a reason the paper is losing advertising - they don't respect their core market. We don't even have Metro briefs anymore."

Yeah, right. And losing advertising to the Web like every other paper has nothing to do with it, right?

Dr. J. Alva Scruggs (not verified) says:

IS SPITZER REALLY THAT BAD???

We all know how difficult it is for us to come to the defense of Spitzer. He may be an adulterer you know. But we must not let these political "Far Right Wing Conservative ulter-moralist" make another miserable case of Spitzer.
History is replete with men, who took unto themselves other woman out side of their marriage. These people were Prophets, kings and men of means/money. King Henry IV had a way of carrying out a change in women. Henry had his wifes beheaded in order to fulfill his appetite for another woman! Then there was Stone Wall Jackson, JFK, FDR, King, Clinton, Nixon, Eisenhower, even Lincoln was rumored to have his extramarital activities.
Yes Spitzer may be indisputably an adulterer and morally wrong. But is he a criminal? No, I think not so far. What Spitzer’s problem is that he brought down too many power men playing “out-side-of-the-box” or just plain old criminals in high places. He was doing business for the people and was a mortal fear to the powerful and criminal!!
May be what American needs is more of the Spitzers as a fearless for the people Public Servants!! Besides as a general reliable rule of thumb, if Rush Limbaugh is against him he must be doing something really good.
And verbally I say unto you, “Let he who, is without sin throw the first stone and then having thrown it in sin quit his job!!”

Dr. J. Alva Scruggs, BS, MS, MA, EdD
Look Forward to Your Comments
E-MAIL JSCRU5750 (at) AOL.COM
Website ; http://franklyspeaking.info

Michael from Montreal (not verified) says:

Wow, nothing special about this women! Women in Montreal, and most of Canada are much prettier, and do not prostitute themselves! Their skin is healther, their lifestyle is healthier, they are smarter and much prettier than most women in the US, and that had been documented! I feel sorry for the families involved, not the man though; I have daughters, would never do something like this to hurt them!

Strange Brew (not verified) says:

Actually, I went to Regina once, and the women there were kind of homely. So it looks like your hypothesis collapses, eh.

Dr. J. Alva Scruggs (not verified) says:

I'm really an idiot who didn't realize that Spritzer took a woman over state lines for immoral purposes; therefore he violated the Mann Act. In this light, Spritzer did break the law; not to mention his misuse of state and campaign funds. I'm sure the ongoing criminal investigation will prove this.

I am sorry for being such a blockhead.

(P.S. Everyone knows a doctorate in Education is worthless; I just put that up there to impress some feeble minds. It doesn't even qualify me to be a principal at an elementary school.)

Dr. J. Alva Scruggs, BS, MS, MA, EdD
Look Forward to Your Comments
E-MAIL JSCRU5750 (at) AOL.COM
Website ; http://franklyspeaking.info

wow gold (not verified) says:

ȫ

google (not verified) says:
Villager (not verified) says:

Very good info... thanks

wow gold (not verified) says:

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.