Arts & Culture

What Edwards Did for the Democrats

Getty Images

Appearing on Sunday’s “Face the Nation” in a pre-taped interview, the latest stop in his reemergence tour, John Edwards explained his rationale for exiting the Democratic race in late January after finishing third in his native South Carolina.

“I had concluded I could stay in the race, keep getting significant numbers of votes, keep accumulating delegates,” he said. “But the overwhelming likelihood was I would not be the nominee.”

The public has been understandably fixated on the chaotic nature of the Clinton-Obama race and the headache-inducing prospect that it could last well into the summer months. When Edwards has been mentioned since his exit, it’s almost always been in the context of a prospective endorsement: Will he hurry up already and throw his weight behind one of them?

The idea, supposedly, is that by taking sides, Edwards would have somehow have been decisive, triggering a conclusion to a never-ending contest. That’s the theory despite the fact that this cycle, like so many others before it, has been a case study in the public’s indifference to endorsements.

What has mostly gone unnoticed is that Edwards, in reaching the decision that he described above, already did his party a gigantic favor.

As the race now stands, Barack Obama has 1,591 pledged delegates and commitments from 275 superdelegates, for a total of 1,866 delegates – just 159 shy of the 2,025 needed for a first-ballot nomination at the convention. Clinton has 1,426 pledged and 271 superdelegates – a total of 1,697. (Edwards still retains 18 pledged delegates he won in the earliest contests.)

The finish line is not too hard to see. There are 217 pledged delegates at stake in the remaining six primaries. Obama, with wins in Oregon, South Dakota and Montana and lopsided losses in West Virginia, Kentucky and Puerto Rico, should win about 100 of them, with Clinton pulling in about 117. Without factoring in any additional superdelegates either candidate reels in between now and then, the end-of-the-primaries delegate scoreboard would then read: Obama 1,966, Clinton 1,814.

That means Obama would to win endorsements from only about 20 percent of the outstanding superdelegates to hit the magic number of 2,025. Given the rate that he’s been winning them over since North Carolina and Indiana, he may win over enough of them before June 3. If he comes up just short, he’s pretty much certain to take care of it by June 4 or June 5. In other words, as close as the contest has been, Obama is set to score a clear victory well before the convention.

Now, imagine the comparative mess Democrats might be in if Edwards had opted to stick around after South Carolina. Obviously, it’s impossible to calculate the exact effect he would have had on the campaign. Were voters, after his poor showings in New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina, tiring of his presence and ready to tune him out for good? Or might they have turned back to him at some point, after tiring of the Clinton-Obama sniping? And perhaps he might have somehow provoked– in a debate, say – some kind of YouTube moment at the expense of one or both of the other candidates?

What we do know is that the proportional allocation rules that govern the Democratic process would have allowed Edwards to collect delegates simply by cracking 15 percent in a given congressional district. Had he stayed in, he would almost certainly have been swamped by Obama and Clinton, but how many delegates would he have won?

A reasonable guess is probably somewhere in the 150 to 200 range. Consider the February 5 primaries, where a number of southern and rural states went to the polls. Just by nabbing between 15 and 20 percent in states like Tennessee, Oklahoma, Missouri, Georgia and Arkansas (and picking of a scattering of delegates in California and some of the other non-southern states to vote that day), Edwards might have netted between 75 and 100 delegates on Super Tuesday. Had he then pressed on, he could potentially have added to that total in some of the smaller states that voted in February and where Clinton failed to organize effectively (Louisiana, maybe?) and then in Ohio in March, Pennsylvania in February, and in his home state of North Carolina as well as West Virginia and Kentucky in May.

There’s no telling exactly at whose expense these delegates would have come. But let’s say Edwards had stayed in and finished the primaries with 200 pledged delegates. (That’s 200 in addition to those that he won as a candidate). And let’s say that they came equally from Clinton’s and Obama’s hides. Suddenly, Obama would need to win more than 60 percent of the remaining superdelegates to break 2,025. And Obama’s pitch to superdelegates would be less persuasive, since Edwards – by drawing a few million votes in all of the primaries– would have fundamentally altered the popular vote math. No one would be in position to claim anything approaching an outright majority.

And that’s not the half of it. With his stash of delegates, Edwards would now be positioned as the convention’s kingmaker. Obama probably wouldn’t reach 2,025 with superdelegate support alone, and Clinton certainly wouldn’t. So the race wouldn’t end until Edwards decided to end it. We might now be facing a summer of speculation about backroom offers and counter-offers from the Obama and Clinton camps to Edwards, and the prospect of a second ballot at a national convention for the first time since 1956 would be more real than ever.

In the same “Face the Nation” interview, Edwards said that he thought quitting the race was going to “accelerate the process.”

“Well, obviously I was dead wrong about that,” he said.

Actually, he’s not nearly as wrong as he says.

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

RACISM IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY ? .... (not verified) says:

.
IS RACISM RUNNING RAMPANT IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY? HILLARY HAS RUN A BLATANTLY RACIST CAMPAIGN. SHE AND BILL HAVE TRIED TO USE THE 'RACE CARD' AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY. --- AND FEW PARTY LEADERS HAVE SPOKEN OUT LOUDLY ENOUGH TO PUT A STOP TO IT.

NEARLY EVERYONE OUTSIDE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY – PUNDITS, MEDIA, REPUBLICANS, INDEPENDENTS - ACKNOWLEDGE THAT OBAMA SHOULD BE THE PARTY’S PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE. BUT A CONTINGENT OF HILLARY’S SUPERDELEGATES WITHIN THE PARTY WILL NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THAT. INSTEAD, THESE HILLARY-SUPER-DELEGATES KEEP HOPING AND PRAYING THAT SOMEHOW THIS BLACK MAN WILL NOT BE THE PARTY’S NOMINEE. AND, HILLARY KEEPS SUGGESTING CODED ARGUMENTS OF HOW OBAMA CAN BE DENIED THE NOMINATION.

HILLARY’S SO-CALLED UNCOMMITTED SUPERDELEGATES ARE SHOWING HOW DEEPLY RACISM IS ENTRENCHED IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

Yes, the racism is loud and clear against the European-American candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton. The racist favoring of Barack Obama combined with the racist discrimination against Hillary Rodham Clinton has been quite evident. And Obama will win the nomination, a crowning racist achievement by the racist Democratic Party.

Anonymous (not verified) says:

Has anyone seriously considered whether we really want a President with the initials B.O.? Maybe that would only have English language speaking people pondering the possibility.

Seriously? (not verified) says:

Wow. The first two commenters both need to sit down, share a coffee, and work through their problems in private. Sheesh. Do you people actually engage with others in social situations?

Art Dodger (not verified) says:

Did Edwards' presence in the race help Obama by splitting the white vote between Edwards and Clinton? Or did Edwards help Clinton by splitting the anti-Hillary vote between Edwards and Obama? AD

Disparaged (not verified) says:

As far as this Dem voter is concerned, John Edwards did NOTHING for this campaign - not in his bid as nominee nor in his lack of action thereafter. His lack of action to endorse a candidate therefore allowing his 18 pledged delegates to be relinquished told me I was thrilled that I did NOT vote for him and that he showed me exactly what type of POTUS he would have made - SELFISH, INEFFECTIVE AND UNIMPRESSIVE. For him to sit back and say nothing had many wondering exactly what he was looking for in a deal, so I am glad he got exactly what he deserved - NOTHING! Due to his lack of participation after he left the race, I can not help but believe that due to his wife, he endorsed the clintons, but now that he knows for a fact they have lost their bid, he won't say a word out loud!

Eagleye (not verified) says:

Hillary and Clinton miscalculated and under estimated Obama. This is what happen to people who are over pompus and over confident. They thought they will have a free ride, but when they found out that they are loosing, they resorted to dirty and damaging politics. What I still do not understand is, why does Hillary want to be the president? Whatever, ideas she has must have been used during her husband's eight years in office. I actually love and respect the Clintons, but I don't agree with her being the president. I think she is a power monger, she just want to be the president to satisfy her ego, not to help the American people.

edward's supporter (not verified) says:

Edwards did right by our party by dropping out when he did. He knew he wasn't getting the votes he needed to stay in the race, and he bowed out, gracefully, and there wasn't a lot of handwringing by him or his supporters.

And, yeah, he could have stayed in the race to be the king/queenmaker -- or spoiler -- but he didn't.

Clinton should follow his example. Do it gracefully. And do it now.

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.