<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Currently Hanging</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/blog/36027/%2A/feed</link>
 <description>Recent posts</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Brownstone Building</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/brownstone-building</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>A young artist recently told me that working from observation was an antiquated endeavor. Why look at a still-life arrangement when taking a photograph of it would do just as nicely? We have, after all, reached a stage in human development when learning from <em>stuff out there</em> is moot. Getting your hands dirty—what’s the point? High tech has made low tech irrelevant, over and out.<br />
<p class="text"><span>The sculptor Jilaine Jones, whose work is at the New York  Studio School, knows otherwise. Mass and volume, proportion and space, line as definition, and the ineluctability of gravity—these are universals best experienced firsthand. Without direct contact, art becomes a tinny imitation of itself—there are 40,000 years or so of world art to prove the point. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/brownstone-building">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/brownstone-building#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/41858">Jilaine Jones</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:40:49 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mario Naves</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71120 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Art Finds Its Way Back to Fun</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/art-finds-its-way-back-fun</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>David Byrne has always been pretentious; that’s part of his charm. From the Talking Heads’ first single in 1977, “Love—Building on Fire,” to his debut as screenwriter and director with <em>True Stories</em>, and to myriad other projects—including, of all things, an opera about Imelda Marcos—Mr. Byrne has proved that faux naïveté, arty self-consciousness and adroitly deployed nerdiness can be diverting and sometimes irresistible.<br />
<p class="text"><span>Notwithstanding a clinical fascination with the common folk, Mr. Byrne is a creature inconceivable outside Manhattan’s artier districts. Closer in aesthetic to the neo-Dadaist Robert Rauschenberg than to the touched-by-God folk painter Howard Finster (both of whom provided Talking Heads CD cover illustrations), Mr. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/art-finds-its-way-back-fun">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/art-finds-its-way-back-fun#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27929">David Byrne</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:16:08 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mario Naves</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70804 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>That&#039;s a Nice Piece of Ash!</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/s-nice-piece-ash</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Whatever else you can say about it, the Chinese artist Zhang Huan’s work, on view at PaceWildenstein’s 22nd and 25th street locations, is perfect tourist fare. Think about it: Chelsea is the hub of the international scene. Its notoriety and commercial clout have extended beyond in-the-know aficionados. Chelsea isn’t the Met, but it is attracting out-of-towners, with kids in tow, eager for the buzz of outrageousness. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/s-nice-piece-ash">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/s-nice-piece-ash#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55355">Zhang Huan</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:01:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mario Naves</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70444 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Iran, So Far Away, in Drawings</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/iran-so-far-away-drawings</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Iran’s worrisome prominence in world events can’t help but cross your mind while viewing “Ardeshir Mohassess; Art and Satire in Iran,” an exhibition on view at the Asia Society. And not only because Mr. Mohassess hails from Iran. His brand of satire is, to put it mildly, skeptical of his home country’s political convolutions. Would Mahmoud Ahmadinejad suffer Mr. Mohassess’ uncompromising art gladly? <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/iran-so-far-away-drawings">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/iran-so-far-away-drawings#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55242">Ardeshir Mohassess</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26227">Iran</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:43:01 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mario Naves</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70055 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Looking Into It</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/looking-it</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Catherine Murphy’s drawings are amazing. As feats of versimilitude, they are without peer in contemporary art—it’s difficult to bring to mind another artist capable of putting pencil to paper with as much concentration and dexterity. Ms. Murphy is unsparing in her dedication to observed fact.<br />
<p class="text"><em><span>Spill</span></em><span> (2007), on display at Knoedler and Company along with a handful of other drawings and seven oil paintings, is a tour de force likely to have viewers gaping in disbelief. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/looking-it">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/looking-it#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/48363">Catherine Murphy</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 12:20:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mario Naves</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69720 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Don&#039;t Call Him an Art Star</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/don-t-call-him-art-star</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>A painter, with tousled hair and a distant gaze, lies upon a rocky ground. He’s dressed in vaguely 19th-century garb and holds a long brush daubed with yellow. A slack noose placed around his neck is tied to an easel. The canvas on it is bright white.<br />
<p class="text">In the background, a ladder leans upright with no discernible support. A gallows is partially draped with black cloth. Further back a cow runs off a cliff. The sky is dusty gray. Blanketing all of it is the musty patina of academic painting come and gone.   <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/don-t-call-him-art-star">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/don-t-call-him-art-star#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50149">Neo Rauch</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 11:31:11 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mario Naves</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69429 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dubrow Is Highbrow</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/dubrow-highbrow</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Drive—<em>aesthetic</em> drive—is rare in contemporary art. Commerce is the thing. And John Dubrow, whose paintings are at Lori Bookstein Fine Art, wants to sell his art as much as the next guy. But viewers will recognize that commerce is the last thing on Mr. Dubrow’s mind when he’s in the studio. His paintings are relentlessly independent, his drive is never in question and, boy, is it intimidating.<br />
<p class="text">Initiative counts for bubkes if the results are lousy; drive can’t be the sole determinant of merit. Mr. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/dubrow-highbrow">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/dubrow-highbrow#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/45473">John Dubrow</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 12:40:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mario Naves</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69126 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How Abstract Clumps Became Philip Roth and Dick Nixon</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/how-abstract-clumps-became-philip-roth-and-dick-nixon</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Once, the American painter Philip Guston (1913-1980) was a polarizing artist. It’s the stuff of legend: An esteemed second-generation Abstract Expressionist, renowned for exquisitely honed arrangements of fleshy brushstrokes, turns to a brutish figurative art—a nightmarish realm of Klansmen, endless hangovers and hellish rooms lit by bare light bulbs. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/how-abstract-clumps-became-philip-roth-and-dick-nixon">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/how-abstract-clumps-became-philip-roth-and-dick-nixon#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/42732">Philip Guston</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 11:45:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mario Naves</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">68791 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Koons’ Expensive Distractions Clutter Met’s Summer Rooftop</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/koons-expensive-distractions-clutter-met-s-summer-rooftop</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>A few months back, I bumped into a colleague at the Met’s Courbet exhibition. After a polite disagreement about the merits of the 19th-century French painter—he’s a fan, I’m not—we extolled the Met’s stellar run of historical exhibitions mounted under the guidance of since-retired director Philippe de Montebello: Ingres, tapestries, Velázquez, the Greek and Roman galleries, the list goes on.<br />
<p class="text">When the discussion turned to the museum’s forays into contemporary art, the requisite eyeball-rolling ensued. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/koons-expensive-distractions-clutter-met-s-summer-rooftop">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/koons-expensive-distractions-clutter-met-s-summer-rooftop#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/30893">Jeff Koons</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/30897">The Metropolitan Museum of Art</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:09:42 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mario Naves</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">68455 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sleeper</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/sleeper</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>In the past 30 years Thomas Nozkowski’s allusive yet enigmatically abstract paintings have gradually acquired a cultlike devotion. This patient, quietly determined artist is the anti-hype—his paintings are <em>slow</em>.<br />
<p class="text"><span>Lately, however, Mr. Nozkowski has been getting a lot of attention. His paintings were featured at the Venice Biennale last summer; a mini-retrospective at Long  Island City’s Emily Fisher  Landau Center just closed; and two of his paintings from MoMA’s permanent collection are currently on display. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/sleeper">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/sleeper#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/33028">Thomas Nozkowski</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:19:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mario Naves</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">68164 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
