<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Culture Czar</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/blog/53093/%2A/feed</link>
 <description>Recent posts</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Gossip Girl Does 30 Rock , Too!</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/i-gossip-girl-i-does-i-30-rock-i</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>It's getting hard to keep up with all the planned <em>30 Rock </em>guest appearances, isn't it? We need a calendar. </p>
<p>Last week <a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/jennifer-aniston-guest-star-30-rock">Jennifer Aniston was announced</a>. Then <a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/will-oprah-be-30-rocks-miracle">Oprah joined her</a>. And now, <em><a href="http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2008/09/blake-lively-an.html">Entertainment Weekly</a></em><a href="http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2008/09/blake-lively-an.html"> has </a><a href="http://ausiellofiles.ew.com/2008/09/blake-lively-an.html">confirmed that <em>Gossip Girl </em>stars Leighton Meester and Blake Lively will appear on the multi-Emmy nominated comedy</a> during November sweeps in a flashback as former high school classmates of Tina Fey's Liz Lemon.</p>
<p> As fans of both shows, this mash-up is like a dream come true. But considering that neither show has any real audience to speak of, is this a wise move?  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/i-gossip-girl-i-does-i-30-rock-i">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/i-gossip-girl-i-does-i-30-rock-i#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50843">30 Rock</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52066">Blake Lively</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50582">Gossip Girl</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54577">Leighton Meester</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:36:28 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74738 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Hugging Lion Gets a Movie Deal</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/hugging-lion-gets-movie-deal</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Well here's one movie we're definitely not going to make it through without crying. We can't even read <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26556641/from/ET/">the news article from MSNBC</a> without tearing up.</p>
<p>Sony Pictures is in negotiations to secure the rights to the story of Christian the hugging lion and the two men, John Rendall and Anthony "Ace" Bourke, who adopted him. The movie will be based off their 1972 book, <em>A Lion Called Christian</em>. There was also a 1971 documentary about the boys reuniting with Christian, but this will apparently be a dramatized version. We'd rather go for the doc, but the new deal is a testament to the power of YouTube and <a href="/2008/killing-me-softly">viral cuteness</a>. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/hugging-lion-gets-movie-deal">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/hugging-lion-gets-movie-deal#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52402">Movies</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:28:15 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gillian Reagan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74725 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Online Viewership of TV Shows Doubles</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/online-viewership-tv-shows-doubles</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>We're tuning into our desktops more and more these days. <a href="http://www.conference-board.org/">The Conference Board</a>, a business research organization, and market research firm <a href="http://www.tnsglobal.com/">TNS Global</a> have the proof! According to <a href="http://www.conference-board.org/economics/consumerBarometer.cfm">their recent report</a>, online viewership of television broadcasts has almost doubled since 2006. One-fifth of families fire up the laptop instead of the big screen. The top two destinations were the official TV channel homepage and YouTube.com. Nine out of ten online viewers check out videos and TV shows at home. But about 15 percent are catching up on <em>Heroes</em> at their workplace. Tsk tsk!</p>
<p>Here's more from <a href="http://www.conference-board.org/economics/consumerBarometer.cfm">the report</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The top five types of shows viewed online are news, drama, sitcom/comedy, reality shows and sports, with user generated content following close behind.</p>
 <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/online-viewership-tv-shows-doubles">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p></blockquote>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/online-viewership-tv-shows-doubles#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:08:20 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gillian Reagan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74713 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Michael Moore Releasing Slacker Movie Online</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/michael-moore-releasing-slacker-movie-online</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Michael Moore is pulling a Radiohead. He's releasing his next new film online at Blip.tv. <em>Slacker Uprising</em> takes us on a 62-city tour during the 2004 election with Mr. Moore, who is rallying young people into the voting booths. It will be available for three weeks as a free download to North American residents, beginning Sept. 23.</p>
<p>This is the first major movie to be released in such a way, <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iq7zxCXnBw7mBDppX7bdIuOPPVbAD9303QDO0">according to the Associated Press</a>.  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/michael-moore-releasing-slacker-movie-online">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/michael-moore-releasing-slacker-movie-online#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52402">Movies</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24544">Michael Moore</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:30:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gillian Reagan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74712 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Entourage Sneak Peek: Vincent Chase Lives!</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/entourage-sneak-peak-vincent-chase-lives</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Here’s a teensy weensy spoiler about what’s ahead in season five of HBO’s <em>Entourage</em>, which starts on Sunday night. Johnny Drama gets the best line, and it involves the word “meth” (trust us: the crowd at the Ziegfeld theater for the premiere on Wednesday night roared). Beyond that, we’ll try not to ruin any surprises for what seems (hopefully) to be a return to what made <em>Entourage</em> so much fun in the first place.</p>
<p>When it first aired in the summer of 2004, <em>Entourage</em> bestowed a little La La Land glitz and glamour to the HBO landscape, which was sorely missing with the then-recent departure of the <em>Sex and the City</em> gals. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/entourage-sneak-peak-vincent-chase-lives">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/entourage-sneak-peak-vincent-chase-lives#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27951">Adrian Grenier</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50480">Entourage</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/35707">Mark Wahlberg</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:04:45 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sara Vilkomerson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74717 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>50 Hitchcock Moments for You to YouTube</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/50-hitchcock-moments-you-youtube</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Another good way of killing time: doing random YouTube searches for old movie scenes and trailers. And the good folks over at the Times Online have just given us a hit list. Earlier this week the London paper posted <a href="http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/article4668188.ece?token=null&amp;offset=0&amp;page=1">Alfred Hitchcock's 50 most memorable moments</a>, complete with a little description of each <em>and</em> a YouTube link to the scene in question (or, in some cases, as much of the scene as was available.) And while the list is incredibly generic at times (the shower scene in <em>Psycho</em> is No. 1) there are still tons of great choices on here to get excited about. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/50-hitchcock-moments-you-youtube">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/50-hitchcock-moments-you-youtube#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52402">Movies</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/32047">Alfred Hitchcock</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:48:55 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christopher Rosen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74715 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sarah Palin Is Not One of Oprah&#039;s Favorite Things</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/sarah-palin-not-one-oprahs-favorite-things</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>According to a statement <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2008/09/05/oprah-to-palin-i-can-pencil-you-in-later/">released</a> to TMZ, Oprah Winfrey will not be inviting Republican Vice Presidential Candidate Sarah Palin onto her show.</p>
<p>Ms. Winfrey's statement was made on the heels of a Drudge Report <a href="http://drudgereport.com/flash3os.htm">report</a> that &quot;Oprah's staff is sharply divided on the merits of booking Sarah Palin...&quot;</p>
<p>Here's what Ms. Winfrey told TMZ:</p>
<blockquote><p>The item in today's Drudge Report is categorically untrue. There has been absolutely no discussion about having Sarah Palin on my show. At the beginning of this Presidential campaign when I decided that I was going to take my first public stance in support of a candidate, I made the decision not to use my show as a platform for any of the candidates. I agree that Sarah Palin would be a fantastic interview, and I would love to have her on after the campaign is over.</p></blockquote>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/sarah-palin-not-one-oprahs-favorite-things#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26774">Oprah Winfrey</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56988">Sarah Palin</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24917">The Drudge Report</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51288">tmz</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:13:10 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt Haber</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74711 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>East Village Radio Celebrates 5 Years of Internet Tunes</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/east-village-radio-celebrates-5-years-internet-radio</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><a href="http://www.eastvillageradio.com/index.php">East Village Radio</a> has been streaming online shows for the past five years but you've probably been missing out on all their awesome jams. Our Friday night always gets warmed up with an episodes of <a href="http://www.eastvillageradio.com/modules.php?name=evrshow&amp;showid=68">The Let Out </a>(run by <a href="http://www.thefader.com/articles/2008/9/4/nyc-east-village-radio-festival">our buds at Fader Magazine</a>) from 6-8 p.m. and <a href="http://www.eastvillageradio.com/modules.php?name=evrshow&amp;showid=69">Mark Ronson's Authentic Shit</a> keeps us going from 8-10 p.m. We often found ourselves wandering <a href="http://gothamist.com/2008/09/05/steve_cohen_east_village_radio.php">to their funny little booth</a> at 1st and 1st to say hey to the local DJs. And we subscribe to the <a href="http://www.eastvillageradio.com/modules.php?name=evrpod">podcasts</a> too.   </p>
<p>In celebration of their half-decade anniversary, EVR is having a big bash at Pier 17 at South Street Seaport this Saturday, Aug. 6 from 1 p.m. to 9 p.m. Superstar DJ Mark Ronson himself was just added to the (free!) concert line-up, which also includes KRS-ONE, Boris, Devin the Dude, Awesome Color, Vivian Girls, Flying Lotus, High Places, Dr. Lonnie Smith, The Hypnotic Brass Ensemble and John Oliver of <em>The Daily Show</em>.  </p>
<p>If you're out of town for the weekend, you can <a href="http://www.eastvillageradio.com:8010/evr.m3u"><strong>listen live</strong></a> on eastvillageradio.com.  </p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/east-village-radio-celebrates-5-years-internet-radio#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/57052">East Village Radio</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:06:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gillian Reagan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74709 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fred Armisen Gets Giggles with Punk Rock Girl</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/thunderant</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>We love former Sleater-Kinney guitarist Carrie Brownstein. We love<em> SNL</em> funny-man Fred Armisen. And you should love <a href="http://www.thunderant.com/index.php">ThunderAnt</a>, a video blog in which Armisen and Brownstein collaborate on a particularly quirky brand of sketch comedy parodying everything from feminist bookstores to Mr. Saddam Hussein. Their riotous new sketch, <a href="http://www.thunderant.com/?p=31">&quot;One Man Show,&quot;</a> takes on performance art—something we, well, <em>don’t</em> love. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/thunderant">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/thunderant#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/arts-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/38065">Carrie Brownstein</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/57049">Fred Armisen</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:28:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John S.W. MacDonald</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74702 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>We  Are Afraid of  Ghostbusters III!</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/we-are-afraid-ghostbusters-iii</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>As if we needed any further proof that Hollywood is fresh out of ideas: <a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117991624.html?categoryid=13&amp;cs=1">Columbia Pictures has hired <em>The Office </em>co-executive producers and writers Lee Eisenberg and Gene Stupnitsky to write a script for <em>Ghostbusters III</em>.</a> </p>
<p>Like everyone else, we still love the original <em>Ghostbusters</em>. It's endlessly quotable (<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w91-GMc3j7I">&quot;yes it's true, this man has no d-k&quot;</a>) and it features some of the funniest comedic performances of the 80s, including Bill Murray at his best. But why would anyone want to see another <em>Ghostbusters</em> sequel? We don't even remember number two! Except for the pink goo, which in a very new age-y way thrived on negative energy. Eww.</p>
<p>Making this project even more iffy is the prospect of &quot;passing the torch&quot; to a new group of ghost busters.  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/we-are-afraid-ghostbusters-iii">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/arts-culture/we-are-afraid-ghostbusters-iii#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52402">Movies</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 11:14:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christopher Rosen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74704 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
