Mr. Ronn: I can't believe you actually wrote that - I have to believe you did not. Further, as an attorney, nothing said so far is blasphemous or cause for a libel suit, you just got your feelings hurt and that does not stand up in a court of law. Who you should be angry with is englemayer. Maybe your strategy is to highlight the fact that yvette is the only woman in the race, but does he have to announce it every chance he gets? This is the blog world. If the lamont/lieberman campaign has shown us anything, it is that the anonymous world of the blogs is effective (I remeber one week where an anonymous blogger spent days commenting on ben smith's private parts, and that thread remained).I live in yvette's district, and like her very much. But your firm has made her campaign all about 5W. She has become lost in your quest to become "known." Dare I say this, but look at yassky's campaign. He has been villified, scrutinized and attack at every turn and still, unless they are putting out a press release/statement or talking about the issues (and we haven't heard any from yvette), then the press secretary is SILENT. Let me get this straight, Mr. Ronn, you want us to identify ourselves because your guy doesn't know how to check the daybook? Oy vey...