Fascinating discussion here. I don't know the district well, but Friedman supporters need to get a clue if they think she's already run a real race by winning a February "special." I would love a citation of the last NYC candidate given the Democratic Party line by a back-room deal of the County Committee who -hasn't- gone on to win!
Any tea leaves being read as to whether the rejection of Sylvia by Curiel and Co. gives an early read on the paper's endorsement in the AG race?
After all, in addition to getting too comfy with the Speaker since taking office, Sylvia is one of the few public officials strongly out there for Mark Green. Depending on your perspective, either she's loyal to a progressive candidate she's supported for many years OR she foolishly hasn't realized that Mark's primary-winning days are done -- and attached herself to the wrong horse for one race too many.
To torture a metaphor: if the Times editorial board goes for Cuomo, Green is most definitely headed to the glue factory!
Fascinating discussion here. I don't know the district well, but Friedman supporters need to get a clue if they think she's already run a real race by winning a February "special." I would love a citation of the last NYC candidate given the Democratic Party line by a back-room deal of the County Committee who -hasn't- gone on to win!
Any tea leaves being read as to whether the rejection of Sylvia by Curiel and Co. gives an early read on the paper's endorsement in the AG race?
After all, in addition to getting too comfy with the Speaker since taking office, Sylvia is one of the few public officials strongly out there for Mark Green. Depending on your perspective, either she's loyal to a progressive candidate she's supported for many years OR she foolishly hasn't realized that Mark's primary-winning days are done -- and attached herself to the wrong horse for one race too many.
To torture a metaphor: if the Times editorial board goes for Cuomo, Green is most definitely headed to the glue factory!