missing text image: sites/all/themes/obs_2007/img/reply.gif
Diamond (not verified) says:
Jade, the Clintons are masterful, but do not jump to conclusions. It could have been an Obama plant as well and it is more likely that was case. (After all, Clinton and Edwards come off bad here.)
Obama is not to be underestimated.
He stands for change. But his organization is borrowing from the Clinton rule-book. "Win at all costs."
Also, since this paper has bought the bull and endorsed Obama, how objective do you think these reports are?
Jade, the Clintons are masterful, but do not jump to conclusions. It could have been an Obama plant as well and it is more likely that was case. (After all, Clinton and Edwards come off bad here.)
Obama is not to be underestimated.
He stands for change. But his organization is borrowing from the Clinton rule-book. "Win at all costs."
Also, since this paper has bought the bull and endorsed Obama, how objective do you think these reports are?
Obama is not to be underestimated.