missing text image: sites/all/themes/obs_2007/img/reply.gif
Diamond (not verified) says:

Jade, the Clintons are masterful, but do not jump to conclusions. It could have been an Obama plant as well and it is more likely that was case. (After all, Clinton and Edwards come off bad here.)

Obama is not to be underestimated.

He stands for change. But his organization is borrowing from the Clinton rule-book. "Win at all costs."

Also, since this paper has bought the bull and endorsed Obama, how objective do you think these reports are?

Obama is not to be underestimated.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.