missing text image: sites/all/themes/obs_2007/img/reply.gif
Peter Kann (not verified) says:
At last! Who knows whether its economic realities or those pesky hedge funds forcing the hand here, but it seems as if the Sulzbergers have finally taken their heads out of the sand and recognized that the Times - oh! their vaunted Times - is just like everyone else: Badly run, top heavy, unfocused and behind the 8-ball when it comes to figuring out how to stay relevant to readers who can easily catch up on the news with a few clicks of the mouse. Gosh, it sounds just like the people who used to run the Wall Street Journal. They were/are more alike than different, I guess, despite the varying tones of their editorial pages.
At last! Who knows whether its economic realities or those pesky hedge funds forcing the hand here, but it seems as if the Sulzbergers have finally taken their heads out of the sand and recognized that the Times - oh! their vaunted Times - is just like everyone else: Badly run, top heavy, unfocused and behind the 8-ball when it comes to figuring out how to stay relevant to readers who can easily catch up on the news with a few clicks of the mouse. Gosh, it sounds just like the people who used to run the Wall Street Journal. They were/are more alike than different, I guess, despite the varying tones of their editorial pages.