Ugh, I hate how Clinton's been spinning the exclusion of Michigan and Florida into a "democracy" issue. How can we call the results of those primary contests, especially Michigan, where Obama was not even on the ballot, representative of the will of the people? Are we to believe NO ONE in Michigan would have voted for Obama? She agreed to the DNC rules when the states' primary dates were moved but still campaigned in those states, knowing that she could pull them out of her pocket as proof of her electibility in swing states. It's hard to lose when you're running against no one (but still only received 55% of Michigan's votes). She lost my vote months ago and she won't get my vote in NY for senator again.