Lieberman Gets His Purge

Joe Lieberman's campaign could hardly have scripted this better:

They now say that peace activists sympathetic to Ned Lamont are trying to revoke the senator's registration as a Democrat in his hometown of New Haven. The argument is that he stopped being a Democrat when he started running as an Independent petitioning candidate.

"This gives the lie to the idea that this is not an effort to purge different ideas from the party," said Lieberman spokesman Dan Gerstein, who referred to the activists as Lamont surrogates.

Lamont, obviously, can't be responsible for the actions of all of his supporters. But talk about off-message...

We're still waiting for a comment from his campaign.

-- Jason Horowitz

UPDATE: The Lieberman campaign has just released a statement on this (after the jump), while Lamontblog has a rebuttal, aimed primarily at Gerstein.

Lieberman Campaign Denounces Party Purge Effort by Lamont Supporters "Dirty political tricks at its worst"

HARTFORD -- Lieberman for Senate Campaign Manager Sherry Brown issued the following statement denouncing the effort launched today by Ned Lamont's supporters to have Joe Lieberman purged from the Democratic Party rolls in New Haven.

"The purge campaign launched today by Ned Lamont's supporters is dirty political tricks at its worst, ranking up there with the outrageous tactics that Katherine Harris and the Republicans used in 2000 in Florida to stop all the votes from being counted.

"This kind of ridiculous, partisan game-playing is not going to provide anyone in Connecticut with better jobs, better health care, or better schools. All it's going to do is deepen our divisions and add to voters frustration with our broken political system.

"Joe Lieberman is running to change that, to builld a new politics of unity and purpose that will bring our state and country together to solve our common problems. We will leave it to Ned Lamont to defend the old politics of partisanship and polarization that he and his supporters want to continue."

  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Newsvine
  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Facebook
  • Stumble Upon
  • Netvibes
  • Windows Live

Comments
Post a comment

Nassau Nell (not verified) says:

..add your inmates/asylum metaphor here....

Anonymous says:

nassau nell - what the hell are you talking about (yet again)?

Anonymous says:

Bubba will be here shortly.

Elm City Elmo (not verified) says:

Nell is right. The Lamonties *are* out to purge the Party, meaning that the inmates are taking over the asylum.

Anonymous says:

No, it means the money-changers and warmongers will be thrown from the temple.

Yoda (not verified) says:

The "rebuttal" confirms that they (at least the bloggers) do want to purge Lieberman from the Party.

RFK (not verified) says:

hey anon 317pm, you brainless lefty...all you think about is purging democrats so the only one left will be you and Lamont..and I wouldn't wait for Bubba to come kick your brainless a**; plenty of good Dems are here to do it.

Bubba (not verified) says:

It is a sad day for all Democrats when a moneybags like Lamont, who fits all the descriptions of George Herbert Walker Bush, is trying to dictate who should be a Democrat.

We all have plenty of folks including 2 Lamont supporters like Sharpton and Jackson among others who could have been bounced from the party (Sharpton together with some disgruntled Ferrer supporters cost a Democratic the NY Mayoralty in 2001).

If Lamont were to win and Democrats follow his and Howard Dean's lead (instead of Rahm Emmanuel and Chuck Schumer), then the party will not only stay in the minority (that's what happens when you're more concerned with beating Dems than GOPers) but is likely to become a third or fourth party in the future.

But Lieberman will win. He will caucus with Dems who will welcome him with open arms and the 2008 Dem nominess will marginalize or rid the party of the Deaniac wackos. And that idiot Kos can go back to giving Bin Laden and company his personal services.

Anonymous says:

Why not just ask Lieberman whether he supports the Democratic Congressional and Gubernatorial candidates? He has been playing both sides. Is he for Shays and Johnson or the Dems? Someone needs to ask him to figure out whose uniform he has on.

Steve Real (not verified) says:

Hey Joe,

I'm an Indepedent.
My primary is the election in November.
There are more Indepents in Connecticut
then either Democrats or Republicans.

Blue State or Red State?
Media B.S..
(For political party novices to feed on.)

Connecticut is a Red, White and Blue state.

It is the time of the Independents,
here in Connecticut.
And possibly for US in Texas too.
I support Kinky Friedman.

You party "boot licks"
better take notice.

We is going to change things around here come November.

Goodluck Joe,
Steve Real

Steve Real (not verified) says:

Hey Joe,

I'm an Indepedent.
My primary is the election in November.
There are more Indepents in Connecticut
then either Democrats or Republicans.

Blue State or Red State?
Media B.S..
(For political party novices to feed on.)

Connecticut is a Red, White and Blue state.

It is the time of the Independents,
here in Connecticut.
And possibly for US in Texas too.
I support Kinky Friedman.

You party "boot licks"
better take notice.

We is going to change things around here come November.

Goodluck Joe,
Steve Real

Post a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd><br> <p> <i> <b> <embed> <img> <blockquote> <span> <strikethrough> <u>
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By checking this box you are giving permission for Observer staff to contact you to obtain contact information and permissions required for publication.