At U.S. Naval War College, Scholar Likens Iraq to Plague
Yesterday the Naval War College in Newport, Rhode Island, opened its annual conference on international strategy with a speech from the Navy Secretary in a vast hall, followed by a panel on American power composed of three scholars, all of whom had opposed the war in Iraq. Indeed, in the biographical notes that were given out to the audience of officers—men and women wearing their dress whites—one of the scholars stated bluntly that he had written about the "folly of invading Iraq."
For an hour the panelists gave their reasons for why they believe America will remain the most powerful country in the world well into this century, regardless of the morass in Iraq. There were about ten questions. The last one was from a Navy commander named Cladgett from Syracuse, who rose in the middle of the audience.
"My question to the panel is, What is the path to success in Iraq?"
There was a damburst of laughter in the audience, then the scholars took it on, one by one. The first, Stephen Walt of Harvard, said "This was a huge strategic blunder, there are no attractive plans forward." The greatest danger—an international conflict in Iraq—would be there no matter when we left. The next man, Robert Art of Brandeis, said, he thought it was extremely important for America's image in the Arab world not to have permanent bases in Iraq.
The last one to speak was the one who had used the word "folly" in the program: John J. Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago. Mearsheimer is 58. He told the audience that when he was a teenager, he had enlisted in the Army. Then he'd spent 1966-1970 at West Point. Then he said this:
I remember once in English class we read Albert Camus's book The Plague. I didn't know what The Plague was about or why we were reading it. But afterwards the instructor explained to us that The Plague was being read because of the Vietnam War. What Camus was saying in The Plague was that the plague came and went of its own accord. All sorts of minions ran around trying to deal with the plague, and they operated under the illusion that they could affect the plague one way or another. But the plague operated on its own schedule. That is what we were told was going on in Vietnam. Every time I look at the situation in Iraq today, I think of Vietnam, and I think of The Plague, and I just don't think there's very much we can do at this point. It is just out of our hands. There are forces that we don't have control over that are at play, and will determine the outcome of this one. I understand that's very hard for Americans to understand, because Americans believe that they can shape the world in their interests.The panel was over. For a moment or two there was stunned silence, and then applause—at once polite, sustained and thunderous.But I learned during the Vietnam years when I was a kid at West Point, that there are some things in the world that you just don't control, and I think that's where we're at in Iraq.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Thanks; I hope that this reaches primetime news.
i'm a huge fan of these gentlemen; cooler than a dozen rock stars!!! we should push on until every one heard them. like the real solders, americans, given a chance, will side with reality.
An interesting article -- thanks. One small quibble: the students at the Naval War College are not cadets. They are commissioned naval officers, some quite high-ranking, receiving training as their careers advance.
Sorry -- was responding to a word used in the link that got me here. I see that this article identifies them as officers.
Isn't it interesting that the so-called "liberal media" hasn't jumped all over this one. Guess they aren't so liberal after all ?
If the Republic is to survive, it will be based on the gentleman and ladies in this room, and those who share their curiosity, training, standards, and ability to keep patriotism above politics.
The majority of boots on the ground in Iraq belong to the Army and the Marine Corps. I wonder if this message would be tolerated by those two services?
Perhaps the Navy's leaders are alot smarter than their counterparts when it comes to Iraq. Bravo for hosting a forum and inviting intellectuals with known stances against the war.
Our military needs to convince its chicken hawk civilian leadership that this war is a mistake. Try reading the new book "Iraq: The Logic of Withdrawal," by Anthony Arnove.
Odd, didn't President Bush just host a panel of Iraq experts at Camp David and wasn't he lauded by the MSM for his broad thinking? Too bad these three weren't a part.
Great article, and good news that the War College is not so narrow minded to blacklist these scholars.
Right on.
Contrary to popular belief, the military is not pro-war. Congratulations to those brave scholars and the honorable officers who applauded.
A note of caution: "the polite, sustained, and thunderous" applause, a bit of a semi-contradiction in itself, has been challenged by another eye witness.
Interesting that there seem not to have been more challenging questions from such an audience to such a panel.
I disagree that there is no solution to Iraq except to wait idly by, as though we have no option except to "do nothing," as though the war will stop by itself. We can withdraw, allowing all nations who so desire to get involved with rebuilding Iraq, and we can continue to commit funds toward rebuilding Iraq, but without active U.S. military involvement. Likening Iraq to a plague -- while I can see the analogy to it spinning out of control -- implies that we can do nothing. In point of fact, we can do something. We took action to get ourselves into this mess, and we must take action to get ourselves out of it. We should never have gone to war in Iraq, but now that we have, it is up to us to admit our mistake and withdraw our forces immediately.
It is unfortunate that this man, as a youth, was taught there was nothing that could be done about Vietnam, and he now believes there is nothing that can be done about Iraq. That conclusion is erroneous.