<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; Kenneth Starr</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24211/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Rate My Professor! Renata Adler: &#039;Hot for goin on 70&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/32969</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->What happens when a titan of journalism moves into classes at Boston University and things get real?

<p>According to the <a href="http://www.ratemyprofessors.com">Rate My Professors.com</a> entries over the last two years on former <i>New Yorker</i> writer and Ken Starr scourge Renata Adler:</p>

<blockquote>How many profs have wikipedia entries longer than most congressmen's? [...] Tells great stories, assigns great lit. Hot for goin on 70</blockquote>

<blockquote> By far the most interesting professor I've ever had. Today she told us that a scene from Woody Allen's "Manhatten" is taken from a conversation she had with Woody. That's crazy!</blockquote>

<blockquote>Renata Adler is a super cool person- so intelligent and interesting and crazy, but she's also an awful teacher. But, her antecdotes about working at the New Yorker and The New York Times (plus the A's she gave everyone in the class) was well worth my time</blockquote>

<blockquote>Totally skatterbrained, never stays on topic, i did no work at all for this class, class is a 80 min free association.</blockquote>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/32969#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28874">Boston University</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24211">Kenneth Starr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28873">Renata Adler</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24267">The New York Times Company</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 06:49:03 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">32969 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Blow by Blow: A Guide to Highbrow Oral Sex Writing and Reportage</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/32894</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><div class="photoCaption" /><img alt="almay.jpg" src="http://themediamob.observer.com/almay.jpg" width="234" height="329" /><br />Almay Ad (Reproduced in John Berger's <i>Ways of Seeing</i>, 1977)</div />

<p>"The oral-sex craze&mdash;and in particular girls' insistence that blowjobs 'aren't sex'&mdash;has often been blamed on Bill Clinton and his semantic calisthenics during the Kenneth Starr investigation. But even if teen girls were looking to the White House for personal guidance, was it really Bubba they were trying to emulate? Girls' private lives are always much more influenced by First Daughters, or even First Ladies, than they are by any pasty politico." - <a href="http://www.powells.com/review/2006_01_17.html?&PID=18"><b>Are You There God? It's Me, Monica</b></a>, by Caitlin Flanagan, <i>The Atlantic</i>, January 2006. [via Powells]</p>

"The idea that a blowjob is a dirty, unsavory chore persists. For some women, they're used as an out when she doesn't want to have sex (or as household quid pro quo: 'If you take out the garbage, I'll give you a bj')."- <a href="http://villagevoice.com/people/0617,bussel,72953,24.html"><b>Long Live Blowjob Nation</b></a>, by Rachel Kramer Bussell, <i>The Village Voice</i>, April 21, 2006.

<p>"Pardon the following intimacy, but performing oral sex has a lot to do with the unequal distribution of pleasure and power. It's more satisfying for the recipient than for the bestower. Without love or emotional connection, it usually makes the bestower an instrument of the recipient's will." - <a href="http://www.tnr.com/blog/culture?pid=15250"><b>AGAINST "SUCKS"</a></b>, by Lee Siegel, TNR.com, April 28, 2006.</p>

"Girls and boys, it turns out, are about equally likely to give and to receive. Actually, at least among younger adolescents, boys overall reported more oral sex experience than girls, but both boys and girls were more likely to report receiving oral sex than giving it--which suggests a lot of respondents are fibbing." - <a href="http://www.reason.com/0605/co.cy.the.shtml"><b>The Great Fellatio Scare</b></a>, by Cathy Young, <i>Reason</i>, May 2006.

<p>"There is another thinkable reason why this ancient form of lovemaking lost its association with the dubious and the low and became an American handshake and ideal. The United States is par excellence the country of beautiful dentistry. As one who was stretched on the grim rack of British 'National Health' practice, with its gray-and-yellow fangs, its steely-wire 'braces,' its dark and crumbly fillings, and its shriveled and bleeding gums, I can remember barely daring to smile when I first set foot in the New World. Whereas when any sweet American girl smiled at me, I was at once bewitched and slain by the warm, moist cave of her mouth, lined with faultless white teeth and immaculate pink gums and organized around a tenderly coiled yet innocent tongue." - <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/features/general/articles/060607fege05"><b>As American as Apple Pie</b></a>, by Christopher Hitchens, <i>Vanity Fair</i>, July 2006.</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/32894#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/bill-clinton">Bill Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28764">Caitlin Flanagan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24211">Kenneth Starr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28763">Rachel Kramer Bussell</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 05:03:16 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">32894 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Song for Monica</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/27722</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><div style="clear:both;"></div>The Clinton administration's grave comedy of manners has been rehashed so many times now, and tossed off so many strange offspring, that any remaining, would-be Clintonian chroniclers are left staring at (ahem! Ed Klein) the bottom of the literary barrel.

<p>There's no way left to swing it, so a troupe of eager musical theater folk have determined...to sing it. <a href="http://www.monicathemusical.com/">Monica! The Musical</a> first appeared last spring. Now, a refined (errr, make that "updated") version, which premiered last night, has already sold out four of six shows at the Upright Citizens Brigade Theater. As your devoted Politicker slave, I went to see for myself.</p>

The cast tromps all over the beaten path, from the tasteless to the clever, with an emphasis on the former. There's lots of physical comedy: Hillary is an amusingly spastic dancer, frugging her heart out, while Bill has a languid, frat-boy lope that makes him look more Animal House than White House. During a press conference, a frenzied George Stephanopoulos tries to mow down Ken Starr with a presidential podium on wheels.

<p>Set against the slapstick backdrop, Monica dreams of someday being "Monica Rodham Clinton." "Now don't cry," Bill tells her, off in a corner at the inaugural ball."You're breaking my heart. And you're being very loud."</p>

What else? Hillary dreams of taking over and...Well, there's that cameo by Tom Jones. He sings away sexual scruples ("Forget it! Forget it! Forgetitforgetit!") while introducing Bill, the young Rhodes scholar, to British prostitutes with lousy teeth.

Leaving the theater, this is what I was thinking: A) There's a reason I'm not a theater critic; and B) In light of the present administration, it doesn't take a musical to create nostalgia for the mildness of Clinton's missteps.<div style="clear:both; padding-bottom: 0.25em;"></div>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/27722#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24930">Ed Klein</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25259">George Stephanopoulos</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24211">Kenneth Starr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25258">Monica Rodham Clinton</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:50:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27722 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Republicans Ready  to Slime Fitzgerald</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/37384</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->Under the harsh but savvy tutelage of Karl Rove, Republicans have repeatedly demonstrated their adhe <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/37384">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/37384#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24462">Karl Rove</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24211">Kenneth Starr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28535">Patrick Fitzgerald</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24266">The White House</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 20:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joe Conason</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">37384 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;Eat You Later&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/26532</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><div style="clear:both;"></div>While the New York Observer is not a family newspaper, this is a family blog. So expect circumlocutions. This afternoon, Room 9 is all atitter over a pile of envelopes, left discreetly near the door. The contents were copies of a short, handwritten love letter apparently from a former City Hall bigwig, whom there's no reason to name, to a woman who was also among the 300,000, as we think of the City payroll.

<p>"Eat you later" was the valediction.</p>

Now, I'm hoping nobody other than me writes about this. And I'm doing it only, of course, to make this high-minded point: This is Kenneth Starr's fault. And blame Allan Jennings too.
<div style="clear:both; padding-bottom: 0.25em;"></div>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/26532#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24210">Allan Jennings</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24211">Kenneth Starr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24209">New York Observer LP</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:14:50 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26532 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bill Tells All … Stop Him!</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/49444</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->Our 42nd President is famous.Famous for putting duties off to the last possible moment (and sometime <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/49444">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/49444#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/bill-clinton">Bill Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24211">Kenneth Starr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24943">Osama bin Laden</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2004 20:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Robert Sam Anson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">49444 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Press Avoids News In Blumenthal Book</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/47675</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->As anyone who has written a book about American politics in recent years can confirm, many members o <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/47675">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/47675#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/bill-clinton">Bill Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24211">Kenneth Starr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/45554">Samuel Dash</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/36548">Sidney Blumenthal</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2003 20:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joe Conason</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">47675 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Slouching Towards Activism: Didion Engages, Gets Angry</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/44960</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->Political Fictions , by Joan Didion. Alfred A. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/44960">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/44960#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/city">O2</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24249">Jesse Jackson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/30682">Joan Didion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24211">Kenneth Starr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/38046">Uncovering Clinton</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Susan Faludi</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">44960 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Monica&#039;s Talking Points Enter Realm of Mystery</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/43836</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->As Dan Rather demonstrated when he interviewed the President on 60 Minutes II, the Clinton legacy wi <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/43836">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/43836#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/41235">Don Foster</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24211">Kenneth Starr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/36399">Linda Tripp</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26822">Monica Lewinsky</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2001 19:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Philip Weiss</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43836 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Reversal of Fortune for Starr&#039;s Spokesman</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/43153</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->Whatever he now feels about his former role as spokesman for the Office of Independent Counsel, Char <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/43153">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/43153#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/40477">Charles Bakaly</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/33567">Don Van Natta</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24211">Kenneth Starr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/39910">O.I.C.</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2000 20:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Joe Conason</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">43153 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
