<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; The New York Times Magazine</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24696/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Twitter Takes Over The World (Because There&#039;s Nothing Newer Yet)</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/twitter-takes-over-world-because-theres-nothing-newer-yet</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Another week, another article about some amazing new communications tool and how it's changing our lives, like, forever!</p>
<p>This time, we're meant to look at the deeper meaning of a new technology that's bringing people closer together, changing the face of advertising and marketing, and even helping make the world a better, safer place.</p>
<p>Per <em>The New York Times</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Here is the beginning of a personal medium which will—in a generation—be as important as any mass medium is today: for back-fence gossiping; for word-of-mouth selling; for citizen participation in fighting crime without getting overly 'involved'; for remote parental control; for two-step opinion information. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/twitter-takes-over-world-because-theres-nothing-newer-yet">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p></blockquote>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/twitter-takes-over-world-because-theres-nothing-newer-yet#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/30956">BusinessWeek Magazine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28332">Clive Thompson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/howard-kurtz">Howard Kurtz</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24696">The New York Times Magazine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54625">Twitter</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28504">William Safire</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:19:58 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt Haber</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74804 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dexter Filkins&#039; War</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/dexter-filkins-war</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>In June, <em>The Observer</em> <a href="/baghdad?page=0%2C1">talked</a> to a number of reporters who'd spent time covering the war in Iraq. While some of their anecdotes sketched out what it's like to be in a dangerous reporting environment—the mortar attacks, the sandstorms, the numbing repetitiveness of a seemingly endless conflict—nothing in that article could prepare readers for the unflinching account of the war offered by <em>New York Times</em>' reporter Dexter Filkins in his book, <a href="http://www.randomhouse.com/knopf/catalog/display.pperl?isbn=9780307266392"><em>The Forever War</em></a>, which <em>The Times Magazine</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/24/magazine/24filkins-t.html?pagewanted=all">excerpted</a> this week.</p>
<p>Here's how Mr. Filkins' describes reporting from Baghdad for <em>The Times</em>: &quot;When I was in Iraq, I might as well have been circling the earth from a space capsule, circling in farthest orbit. Like Laika in Sputnik. A dog in space. Sending signals back to base, unmoored and weightless and no longer marking time.&quot; <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/dexter-filkins-war">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/dexter-filkins-war#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28767">Dexter Filkins</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24268">Iraq</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24696">The New York Times Magazine</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 10:45:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt Haber</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">73687 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Times Magazine Plays Nice With Advertisers; Creates &#039;Cover-Wrap&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/times-magazine-plays-nice-advertisers-creates-cover-wrap</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Hopeful to prove to investors that <em>The Times</em> is doing <em>something</em> about the <a href="/2008/media/black-and-white-red-all-over-2008-worst-year-modern-newspaper-history">worst economic year ever for newspapers</a>, <em>The New York Times Magazine</em> is letting advertisers do all sorts of new things to their magazines. Last week, <em>Play</em> had a single sponsor—in the magazine, and on the Web site—for the <a href="/2008/media/nielsen-company-single-sponsor-times-play-magazine-sunday">first time ever</a>.</p>
<p>This week, an otherwise provocative (though <a href="http://www.bwog.net/uploads/04cov395.jpg">somewhat</a> <a href="http://www.esquire.com/cover-detail?year=1966&amp;month=10">familiar</a>) cover—white letters against a black background asking, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/10/magazine/10politics-t.html?ref=magazine">IS OBAMA THE END OF BLACK POLITICS?</a>—is hidden under a partial wrap for an advertisement for U.S. Trust.</p>
<p>The placement is similar to the cover wrap that appears on the cover of the newsstand edition of <em>The New Yorker</em> with a few key differences: the wrap on <em>The New York Times</em> <em>Magazine</em> doesn't ride up the entire length of the book, so it's a little more cumbersome; <em>The New Yorker's</em> wrap actually tells you what's in the magazine (as opposed to its abstract covers) whereas <em>The New York Times</em> <em>Magazine</em>'s wrap actually distracts you from the cover with an ad about philanthropy. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/times-magazine-plays-nice-advertisers-creates-cover-wrap">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/times-magazine-plays-nice-advertisers-creates-cover-wrap#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24696">The New York Times Magazine</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 13:53:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">73072 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Way We Freak Now: Trolls</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/magazine-what-we-fear-now-trolls</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><em>The New York Times</em> has <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/03/magazine/03trolls-t.html?ref=magazine">posted a preview</a> of a story by Mattathias Schwartz from this week's <em>Magazine</em> about trolls, people (mostly young men, it seems), who enjoy wreaking havoc on the Internet by mocking the dead, hacking into MySpace accounts, harassing message boards, and in one case, allegedly trying to induce seizures in epileptics via flashing images.</p>
<p>Why do they do it? As Mr. Schwartz (who we hope has good security on his personal <a href="http://www.mattathiasschwartz.com/">Web site</a>), writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>'Lulz' is how trolls keep score. A corruption of 'LOL' or 'laugh out loud,' 'lulz' means the joy of disrupting another’s emotional equilibrium. 'Lulz is watching someone lose their mind at their computer 2,000 miles away while you chat with friends and laugh,' said one ex-troll who, like many people I contacted, refused to disclose his legal identity. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/magazine-what-we-fear-now-trolls">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/magazine-what-we-fear-now-trolls#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24696">The New York Times Magazine</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:07:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt Haber</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72714 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Nielsen Company is Single Sponsor for the Times&#039; Play Magazine This Sunday</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/nielsen-company-single-sponsor-times-play-magazine-sunday</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>This Sunday's <em>Play Magazine</em> will be full of Olympics stuff, a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/03/sports/playmagazine/803PHELPS-t.html?hp">profile</a> of Michael Phelps and something else: one advertiser.</p>
<p>The Nielsen Company, formerly VNU, will be the sole sponsor for this Sunday's <em>Play</em>, the only time <em>The Times</em> has ever given one of its editorial enterprises an exclusive arrangement. This was actually announced very quietly by the paper <a href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=105317&amp;p=irol-pressArticle&amp;ID=1116958&amp;highlight=">many months ago</a>, but who remembers?</p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/nielsen-company-single-sponsor-times-play-magazine-sunday#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56252">Nielsen Ratings Service</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56253">Play Magazine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24696">The New York Times Magazine</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:05:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72668 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Times Magazine Excerpts Media Writer&#039;s Addiction Memoir</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/times-magazine-excerpts-media-writers-addiction-memoir</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><em>The New York Times</em> website has just <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/20/magazine/20Carr-t.html">posted</a> a preview of this week's <em>Times Magazine</em> featuring an excerpt from media columnist David Carr's forthcoming book, <a href="http://www.nightofthegun.com/?wsref=3&amp;num=582#"><em>The Night of the Gun</em></a>.</p>
<p>The story, like the book, tells of Mr. Carr's years of drug and alcohol abuse and his various scrapes with the law as he somehow managed to rise in journalism and raise his twin daughters. There's also a <a href="http://video.on.nytimes.com/?fr_story=7ba4c55639e387072313368501cc4d5ef917c4de">video</a> in which Mr. Carr explains the book's title and how his attempt to remember &quot;the night of the gun&quot; set the tone for his investigative approach to his own experiences.</p>
<p>Not included in the extract? <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000792/">Tom Arnold</a>, who plays a special role in Mr. Carr's book and in his life. </p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/times-magazine-excerpts-media-writers-addiction-memoir#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27508">David Carr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24696">The New York Times Magazine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55947">Tom Arnold</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:00:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt Haber</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72034 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Times Magazine Goes Down Familiar Path: When In Doubt, Go to the Pets!</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/times-magazine-goes-down-familiar-path-when-doubt-go-pets</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>There's an old philosophy in journalism that when you're in a jam, or you're at a loss for an idea, do a pets story! No matter what, it's almost always a hit with readers (just like it is <a href="/2008/killing-me-softly">on the web).</a> So just over a month after the Emily Gould <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/25/magazine/25internet-t.html?partner=rssnyt">cover story</a> in the<em> Times Magazine</em>, which came a week before a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/01/magazine/01tyra-t.html?partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss">puffy profile</a> on Tyra Banks, the <em>Magazine</em> has its pet story <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/13/magazine/13pets-t.html?_r=1&amp;ref=magazine&amp;oref=slogin">on the cover</a> for this weekend. </p>
<p>And it works beautifully. The story is about our increasing&mdash;and maddening&mdash;tendency to medicate pets for things like anxiety and compulsiveness. James Vlahos, a science writer for <em>National Geographic</em> and <em>Popular Science</em>, is a first-time writer for the magazine, and we want to see more. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/times-magazine-goes-down-familiar-path-when-doubt-go-pets">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/times-magazine-goes-down-familiar-path-when-doubt-go-pets#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55811">James Vlahos</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52605">pets</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24696">The New York Times Magazine</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:05:51 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71686 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>George Lois, Mad As Hell</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/george-lois-mad-man</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>George Lois is nothing if not opinionated. The universally heralded <a href="http://www.georgelois.com/">adman</a> and creator of <em>Esquire</em>'s most <a href="http://moma.org/exhibitions/exhibitions.php?id=8158">canonical</a> covers from the '60s, shares his take on AMC's <a href="http://www.amctv.com/originals/madmen/"><em>Mad Men</em></a> with <em>The New York Times Magazine</em>'s Alex Witchel <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/22/magazine/22madmen-t.html">this week</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>When I hear ‘Mad Men,’ it’s the most irritating thing in the world to me. When you think of the ’60s, you think about people like me who changed the advertising and design worlds. The creative revolution was the name of the game. This show gives you the impression it was all three-martini lunches. ...  </p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>We worked from 5:30 in the morning until 10 at night. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/george-lois-mad-man">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/george-lois-mad-man#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28465">George Lois</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52206">Mad Men</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24696">The New York Times Magazine</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:58:30 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt Haber</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71021 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Times Magazine Dapples Sunlight On Its Memoirist</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/times-magazine-dapples-sunlight-it-s-memoirist</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>This past winter, Paul Tough, a story editor at <em>The New York Times Magazine</em>, brought Emily Gould, a recently retired editor of Gawker.com, to the sixth floor of the paper’s skyscraper on Eighth Avenue. Sometimes, writers meet with the magazine’s editor in chief, Gerry Marzorati, and this was one of those times.<br />
<p class="text"><span>Mr. Marzorati had never before heard of Ms. Gould, he told Off the Record. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/times-magazine-dapples-sunlight-it-s-memoirist">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/times-magazine-dapples-sunlight-it-s-memoirist#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51995">Emily Gould</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50052">Gawker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28250">Gawker Media LLC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24696">The New York Times Magazine</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 20:05:45 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69792 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New York Times Magazine Blog Article Tears Media Blogosphere Asunder</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/new-york-times-magazine-blog-article-rips-media-blogosphere-asunder</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Emily Gould's <em>New York Times Magazine</em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/25/magazine/25internet-t.html?em&amp;ex=1211688000&amp;en=beb20c82f3058f7a&amp;ei=5070">cover story</a> hasn't even landed with a thud on front porches and newsstands yet, but it's already garnering a ton of criticism online. </p>
<p>Some of the critical outlets weren't surprising. </p>
<p>Like Gawker, for example, since Ms. Gould's article is in many ways a rebuke of the site. </p>
<p>Gawker's first post <a href="http://gawker.com/5010427/emily-gould-exposed">officially linked</a> to Ms. Gould's <em>Times Magazine</em> story received 9,133 views and 170 comments. </p>
<p>A <a href="http://gawker.com/392697/we-are-all-emilys">follow-up post</a> clocked in at 8,814 views with 149 comments, while a post <a href="http://gawker.com/5010653/comments-closed-on-emily-goulds-times-piece">announcing comments had closed</a> on NYTimes.com received only 4,150 views and 83 comments. </p>
<p>Sadly, another, about the article's <a href="http://gawker.com/392968/the-personal-narrative-photographed">photos,</a> topped out at only 2,556 views and 55 comments. </p>
<p>Finally, it seemed, for Gawker, the horse had been kicked to death. </p>
<p><em>New York</em> magazine's Daily Intel had a <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2008/05/emily_goulds_times_magazine_st.html">wonkishly incisive post</a> in which its editors calculated how many dollars Ms. Gould was presumed to have been paid for the words &quot;I&quot; and &quot;me&quot; in the 7,937-word article. (Eight hundred and sixty dollars, by Daily Intel's math. One wonders how many I's and me's were in <em>New York</em>'s equally controversial first person <a href="http://nymag.com/relationships/sex/47055/">cover story</a> this week.) <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/new-york-times-magazine-blog-article-rips-media-blogosphere-asunder">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/new-york-times-magazine-blog-article-rips-media-blogosphere-asunder#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51995">Emily Gould</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50052">Gawker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50491">Huffington Post</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54117">Mediabistro</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51672">New York Magazine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28623">Rachel Sklar</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24696">The New York Times Magazine</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:04:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Matt Haber</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69629 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
