<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; Harry Reid</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24963/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>A Conflicted Lieberman Lays Off The Red Meat</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/conflicted-lieberman-lays-red-meat-0</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Since John McCain sewed up the Republican nomination, it's been obvious that Joe Lieberman - his constant campaign traveling companion and one of his closest personal friends and political allies - would address the G.O.P. convention. What wasn't so obvious was which Joe would show up.</p>
<p>The answer hinged on the outcome of McCain's vice-presidential search. Probably from the beginning, McCain was inclined to tap Lieberman - and as the end of the process approached, it became clear that that's where his heart was.</p>
<p>If McCain had followed through on that instinct, then Lieberman would have shown up in St. Paul ready to spew red meat. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/conflicted-lieberman-lays-red-meat-0">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/conflicted-lieberman-lays-red-meat-0#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56655">Convention</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/bill-clinton">Bill Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24963">Harry Reid</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52317">Joe Lieberman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:31:11 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">74493 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How Obama and the Democrats Screwed Up on Drilling</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/how-obama-and-democrats-screwed-drilling</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>The Democrats are supposed to own the issue of energy, if only because they've mastered the art of tarring Republicans as the party of Big Oil. It's a caricature that the G.O.P., with its mocking scorn for conservation, addiction to corporate tax cuts and unkickable habit of nominating oil men for national office, has done nothing to refute.</p>
<p>Of course, the Democrats are also (supposedly) the masters of the blown political save, experts at devising new and ever more elaborate means of snatching electoral defeat from the jaws of victory. So it's only fitting that now, just as energy assumes unprecedented prominence in a presidential campaign, they've gone and adopted a maddeningly incomprehensible message that threatens to forfeit the powerful emotional advantage they've enjoyed on the subject for decades. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/how-obama-and-democrats-screwed-drilling">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/how-obama-and-democrats-screwed-drilling#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52995">Green</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24963">Harry Reid</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25596">Nancy Pelosi</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51580">Oil</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:27:42 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72965 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bloomberg to Las Vegas for Energy Speech</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/bloomberg-going-las-vegas-energy-speech</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Mayor and national policy activist <a href="http://cleanenergysummit.org/agenda.html ">Michael Bloomberg will participate</a> at the National Clean Energy Summit in Las Vegas, organized by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.</p>
<p>At the August 19 event, Bloomberg will deliver a keynote speech around 3 p.m., and former President Bill Clinton will deliver closing remarks about two hours later. </p>
<p>And, according to his office, the mayor will make a stop on the way to the event in order to attend a re-election fund-raiser for Republican congressman Mark Kirk, who <a href="http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/il10_kirk/Fire_Sale.html ">helped push Bloomberg’s anti-illegal gun message in Congress.</a></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/bloomberg-going-las-vegas-energy-speech#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52995">Green</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24963">Harry Reid</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56292">Mark Kirk</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/michael-bloomberg">Michael Bloomberg</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:41:05 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Azi Paybarah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72785 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>When the Democrats Don&#039;t Need Joe Lieberman Anymore</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/when-democrats-dont-need-joe-lieberman-anymore</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Ordinarily, the “most endangered incumbent” label applies to an office holder who is standing for reelection. In 2008, however, the most endangered member of the U.S. Senate’s Democratic Caucus won’t be on any ballots. It’s Joe Lieberman.
<p>Lieberman just won his fourth six-year term in 2006, but no member of the Senate majority – with the possible exception of Mary Landrieu, the lone Democratic senator facing a tricky reelection fight this year – stands to lose more this November than Connecticut’s junior senator.</p>
<p>Since the ’06 elections, Lieberman’s supposed role as the Senate’s ultimate power broker has been touted endlessly. Rejected by the party that once nominated him for vice president in the August ’06 primary, he nonetheless won reelection in the fall as a self-described “independent Democrat,” promising to caucus with Democrats and to side with them for organizing purposes in the Senate. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/when-democrats-dont-need-joe-lieberman-anymore">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/when-democrats-dont-need-joe-lieberman-anymore#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24963">Harry Reid</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52317">Joe Lieberman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:24:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70588 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Unspectacular Harry Reid</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/unspectacular-harry-reid</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>It seems odd that Harry Reid, whose generally dispassionate manner probably strikes the casual listener as plain and boring, now enjoys a reputation as a hothead.
<p> Of course, it’s not the way he talks, but the words that occasionally slip from his mouth that have fed the right’s bid to caricature him as an unstable fringe figure: the erratic, America-hating lefty who called President Bush a loser and a liar and who said the war in Iraq is lost.  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/unspectacular-harry-reid">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/unspectacular-harry-reid#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28702">Bob Schieffer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24963">Harry Reid</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:00:17 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">56154 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Schumer and Reid Make the Case in Midtown</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/schumer-and-reid-make-case-midtown</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p class="MsoNormal">The Millennium UN Plaza Hotel in midtown, Senate Democratic leaders made a public plea for President Bush not to veto a $124 billion war spending measure that would order troops to begin leaving Iraq by October. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>&quot;We call on the president to look into his heart, give it one more thought and sign the bill that the American people want,&quot; Chuck Schumer said. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>The inevitability of the veto made the Democratic overture little more than a publicity exercise designed to convey the message that they had done all they could.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>But Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid indicated that there was a point to it all, and that there was a possibility of reaching some kind of post-veto accord.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>&quot;If you look at his statements over the last few days, I think they have been promising,&quot; Reid said, citing what he called “buzz words” by the administration. &quot;The president&#39;s changed his tune.&quot; </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>He added, &quot;We understand that legislation is the art of compromise.&quot;</span> <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/schumer-and-reid-make-case-midtown">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/schumer-and-reid-make-case-midtown#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49907">Chuck Schumer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/george-w-bush">George W. Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24963">Harry Reid</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:36:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jason Horowitz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">53607 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Blunderers Are Winning The Debate</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2007/blunderers-are-winning-debate</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>To say that Harry Reid’s pronouncement that the war in Iraq is “lost” stirred a media frenzy last week is an understatement. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2007/blunderers-are-winning-debate">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2007/blunderers-are-winning-debate#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24963">Harry Reid</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 18:01:51 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">53473 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Letters</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/36735</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->Closure on Cloture
&nbsp;
To the Editor:
&nbsp;
 <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/36735">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/36735#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24498">Boston</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24963">Harry Reid</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/32255">Klaus Biesenbach</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26584">YouTube Inc.</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">36735 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Letters</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/37203</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->Closure on Cloture
&nbsp;
To the Editor:
&nbsp;
 <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/node/37203">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/37203#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24498">Boston</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24963">Harry Reid</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/32255">Klaus Biesenbach</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26584">YouTube Inc.</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 19:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">37203 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Elsewhere: McCain, Azzopardi, Janison</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/node/30741</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><div class="photoCaption" /><img alt="janison-returns.JPG" src="http://thepoliticker.observer.com/janison-returns.JPG" width="400" height="531" /><br /></div />

<p>Chuck Todd thinks <a href="http://nationaljournal.com/todd.htm">John McCain will save the GOP</a>.</p>

Whose <a href="http://blogs.nydailynews.com/dailypolitics/archives/2006/11/who_lost_the_st_1.php">fault</a> is it that the Democrats didn't win the state Senate?

<p>Kos wants to know what readers think about the leadership job being done by <a href="http://feeds.dailykos.com/~r/dailykos/index/~3/49750737/08">Howard Dean</a>, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and Rahm Emanuel.</p>

Greg Sargent doesn't like the prevailing Joe <a href="http://www.prospect.org/horsesmouth/2006/11/post_423.html">Lieberman narrative</a>.

<p>An anonymous blogger wants to keep track of <a href="http://spitzerdayone.blogspot.com/">Eliot Spitzer's Day One</a> plans for changing Albany.</p>

<a href="http://www.gothamgazette.com/blogs/wonkster/2006/11/15/the-fight-over-julia-richman/">Wonkster explains</a> why the city likes charter schools, but isn't thrilled about the Julia Richman Educational Complex.

<p>The AP has more on <a href="http://thepoliticker.observer.com/2006/11/first-setback.html">our item about Emily Pataki </a>and the bar exam, rightly noting that both <a href="http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newyork/ny-bc-ny-brf--barexam-patak1115nov15,0,12758.story?coll=ny-region-apnewyork">John F. Kennedy Jr. and Dennis Vacco failed</a> on their first attempts too.</p>

Welcome to <a href="http://blogs.timesunion.com/capitol/?p=2766">Rich Azzopardi</a>, the Senate Democrats' new press person.

<p>And pictured above is Newsday's<a href="http://www.newsday.com/news/columnists/ny-danjanison-column,0,4743193.columnist">Dan Janison</a> with a bottle of ale.</p>

<em>-- Azi Paybarah</em>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/node/30741#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24334">Charles Schumer</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24963">Harry Reid</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25596">Nancy Pelosi</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26503">Rahm Emanuel</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">30741 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
