<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; John Edwards</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49776/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>John Edwards and Club of Two-Time Running Mates</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/john-edwards-and-rare-occasion-two-time-losing-running-mate</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>John Edwards could have taken the <a href="http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/politics/blog/2008/07/jim_webb_bows_out_of_veepstake.html">Jim Webb route</a> when<a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/07/08/edwards-would-seriously-consider-vp-offer/"> NPR grilled him </a>yesterday about his interest in reprising his role as the Democratic vice presidential nominee, but instead he said this: &quot;I am prepared to seriously consider anything, anything he asks me to do for our country.&quot;
<p>     If Barack Obama were to choose Edwards, it would create an unusual situation in American politics. Very rarely does a losing vice presidential nominee land on someone else's ticket in a future election. Edwards would be the fourth person ever to do this, and the first since 1916. </p>
<p>The others:  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/john-edwards-and-rare-occasion-two-time-losing-running-mate">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>
<p><a>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/john-edwards-and-rare-occasion-two-time-losing-running-mate#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55789">Adlai Stevenson I</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55795">Alton Parker</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/40927">Benjamin Harrison</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55790">Charles Fairbanks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55792">Charles Pinckney</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55796">Henry Davis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55793">James Blaine</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27008">Jim Webb</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-edwards">John Edwards</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55791">Rufus King</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26249">Samuel Tilden</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24929">Theodore Roosevelt</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55788">Thomas Hendricks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55794">William Howard Taft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/32162">William Jennings Bryan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/34344">William McKinley</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 11:52:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71631 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Edwards Goes With the Sure Thing</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/edwards-goes-sure-thing</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>John Edwards’ endorsement of Barack Obama matters because the media is treating it like it does. Twenty-four hours after Hillary Clinton celebrated a 41-point landslide victory in West Virginia, the press now has fresh reason to speculate about a final death blow to her campaign, creating a narrative that could unleash the decisive superdelegate flood the Obama campaign has been waiting for.
<p>But, really, is this huge&mdash;or even surprising&mdash;news? Obama was going to win the nomination with or without Edwards’ backing. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/edwards-goes-sure-thing">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/edwards-goes-sure-thing#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49812">2008 Democrats</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/hillary-clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-edwards">John Edwards</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28259">West Virginia</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 08:05:39 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69247 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Trippi Sees Floodgates Opening For Superdelegates After Edwards Endorsement of Obama </title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/trippi-sees-floodgates-opening-superdelegates-after-edwards-endorsement-obama</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>I asked Joe Trippi, a former senior adviser to John Edwards, why the North Carolina senator decided to endorse Barack Obama today.</p>
<p>He said he didn't know the motivations. He wanted to talk impact. </p>
<p>&quot;I don't know why, I just know it's big,&quot; he said. &quot;I don't know what other endorsement you'd really want right now. He is Mr. Blue Collar. His whole life has been fighting for blue-collar people.&quot;  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/trippi-sees-floodgates-opening-superdelegates-after-edwards-endorsement-obama">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/trippi-sees-floodgates-opening-superdelegates-after-edwards-endorsement-obama#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/hillary-clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-edwards">John Edwards</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54803">John Edwards&amp;#039; Endorsement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:42:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jason Horowitz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69241 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>As Edwards Endorsement Breaks, Clinton Donors Shrug </title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/edwards-endorsement-breaks-clinton-donors-shrug</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>The news of <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2008/05/edwards_backing.html">John Edwards' endorsement of Barack Obama </a>was reported as Hillary Clinton addressed her top donors in her Washington, D.C., home today. </p>
<p>&quot;It actually broke during the meeting, and I was passing my BlackBerry around when NBC confirmed it,&quot; said one donor in the room.  The reaction of the fund-raisers in the room was mixed, according to the bundler. &quot;Some people said, 'Shit, now we have to deal with this?' Other people said, and I agree with this, 'Who cares? Maybe if he did it two months ago. But now who cares?'&quot; </p>
<p>Someone in the room sought to inform Clinton of the news by declaring out loud &quot;Edwards has just endorsed Obama,&quot; according to the donor.  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/edwards-endorsement-breaks-clinton-donors-shrug">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/edwards-endorsement-breaks-clinton-donors-shrug#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/hillary-clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-edwards">John Edwards</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:27:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jason Horowitz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69240 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What Edwards Did for the Democrats</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/what-edwards-did-democrats</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter-->Appearing on Sunday’s “Face the Nation” in a pre-taped interview, the latest stop in his reemergence tour, John Edwards explained his rationale for exiting the Democratic race in late January after finishing third in his native South Carolina.<p>“I had concluded I could stay in the race, keep getting significant numbers of votes, keep accumulating delegates,” he said. “But the overwhelming likelihood was I would not be the nominee.” <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/what-edwards-did-democrats">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/what-edwards-did-democrats#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/hillary-clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-edwards">John Edwards</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 21:43:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69035 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Edwards Spokesman on Elizabeth&#039;s Hillary Leanings</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/edwards-spokesman-elizabeths-hillary-leanings</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Edwards spokesman Matthew Nelson just sent over this response to a question I asked about the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/29/us/politics/29edwards.html?ref=politics">assertion in today's Times story suggesting that Elizabeth Edwards was pressuring John Edwards to endorse Hillary Clinton</a>:
<p>"Unless you're hearing from John or Elizabeth themselves, and not unnamed sources, I wouldn't put much stock in it.  Information is currency in politics, and there is a lot of fake currency floating around out there. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/edwards-spokesman-elizabeths-hillary-leanings">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/edwards-spokesman-elizabeths-hillary-leanings#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/elizabeth-edwards">Elizabeth Edwards</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/hillary-clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-edwards">John Edwards</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:19:17 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jason Horowitz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">68523 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A Lot of Edwards Supporters Endorse Obama</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/lot-edwards-supporters-endorse-obama</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>The Obama campaign just announced, conspicuously, “the endorsement of 49 prominent supporters of John Edwards&mdash;including Ed Turlington, Edwards' former National General Chairman.”
<p> But not Edwards himself.</p>
<p> It seems fair to ask whether the Obama campaign could have assembled this coalition without Edwards' tacit approval or at least knowledge, particularly when they likely did so with the upcoming North Carolina primary in mind. </p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/lot-edwards-supporters-endorse-obama#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/hillary-clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-edwards">John Edwards</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:17:28 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katharine Jose</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">68289 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why Does Ralphie Run?</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/why-does-ralphie-run</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><img src="/files/images/Columbia_Green.jpg" width="140" height="25" />&nbsp;As Ralph Nader becomes the Harold Stassen of the 21st century and a running joke to everyone except Al Gore, we sometimes forget that a generation ago (When Stassen was our perennial candidate for President), Nader was a founder of the consumer and environmental movement. How does someone evolve from one of the most credible policy advocates in the country, to a punch line on late night television?</p>
<p>When you buckle your seatbelts and when your air bag deploys—saving your life—you should thank Ralph Nader. The Clean Air Act, the Federal Environmental Protection Agency and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act are at least partially due to Nader’s skill as an advocate in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s.</p>
<p>I mention the history because Nader did not build his reputation as a consumer and environmental advocate by pushing symbolism at the expense of results. He must know that his popularity is trending down. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/why-does-ralphie-run">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/why-does-ralphie-run#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52995">Green</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53693">2000 Election</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49892">2008</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/bill-clinton">Bill Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/george-w-bush">George W. Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-edwards">John Edwards</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/25827">Ralph Nader</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24746">Ronald Reagan</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:15:16 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steven Cohen, Executive Director, Columbia University’s Earth Institute</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66219 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>If She Loses, What Then?</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/if-she-loses-what-then</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>As devastating as it was to her party, it was—in purely political terms—good news for Hillary Clinton when John Kerry finished inches short of George W. Bush in the 2004 election.
<p>Ms. Clinton had opted to sit out the '04 race, a decision that placed the fate of whatever White House ambition she harbored in Mr. Kerry's hands. A Kerry victory in '04 would have taken the Democratic nomination out of play until 2012, by which time other Democrats—like Vice President John Edwards, for instance—would likely have emerged and eclipsed her. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/if-she-loses-what-then">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/if-she-loses-what-then#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/hillary-clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-edwards">John Edwards</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.observer.com/files/columnone_022608.jpg" length="25273" type="image/jpeg" />
 <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:41:02 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65583 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Super Tuesday Stakes</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/super-tuesday-stakes</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><b>Democrats</b>
<p><i>Barack Obama:</i></p>
<p>At a minimum, Obama needs to keep the overall delegate count relatively close, so that even if he falls behind Hillary, he won’t be in a position where he needs to sweep the rest of the primaries and caucuses to catch up. Even though delegates are given out proportionally at the district level, Obama also needs to win multiple states in different regions to make a statement about his national viability. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/super-tuesday-stakes">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/super-tuesday-stakes#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/barack-obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/hillary-clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-edwards">John Edwards</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/john-mccain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26228">Mike Huckabee</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26468">Mitt Romney</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/supertuesday">Super Tuesday</category>
 <enclosure url="http://www.observer.com/files/columnone_020508.jpg" length="27350" type="image/jpeg" />
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 22:02:28 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Steve Kornacki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">64524 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
