<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; Rupert Murdoch</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51162/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Those 95 New Hires for Dow Jones Aren&#039;t Going to The Journal</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/those-95-new-hires-dow-jones-arent-going-journal</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>In the memo in which Dow Jones editor in chief Robert Thomson announced there would be job cuts at <em>The Journal</em>, he also said: &quot;Our new budget includes an ambitious expansion of our web and international operations, both for the <em>Journal</em> and for Newswires, where we are adding 95 journalists over coming months.&quot;</p>
<p>So where exactly are those 95 people going? Not to <em>The Wall Street Journal.</em></p>
<p>A spokesman for <em>The Journal</em>, Bob Christie, told Media Mob that those new hires will all be assigned to Dow Jones news wires, not at <em>The Journal.</em> Mr. Christie reminds us, however, that wire copy can be used, of course, inside the pages of <em>The Journal.</em></p>
<p>And what's the time frame for these hires? He said they'll start now, and there's no end date in mind. So, conceivably, Mr. Thomson can take as long as he wants to hire. </p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/those-95-new-hires-dow-jones-arent-going-journal#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56120">Bob Christie</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50465">Dow Jones</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54665">Robert Thomson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/rupert-murdoch-0">Rupert Murdoch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24283">The Wall Street Journal</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:19:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72428 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wall Street Journal: &#039;The goal is fewer editors, more reporters&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/wall-street-journal-goal-fewer-editors-more-reporters</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><a href="http://nbs.gmnews.com/news/2008/0724/front_page/002.html">A story in</a> the <em>North Brunswick Sentinel</em> has some valuable updates on the job cuts that are going down at <em>The Wall Street Journal.</em></p>
<p>Bob Christie, spokesman for <em>The Journal</em>, tells the <em>Sentinel </em>that <em>The Journal</em> will cut 39 jobs from its South Brunswick office, and relocate 11 people to the paper's office in Manhattan (so the '50' number <a href="/2008/media/wall-street-journal-cuts-50-jobs-closes-south-brunswick-office">we were all</a> using is a bit off). The 39 who are getting the ax will have a chance to &quot;apply&quot; for positions in New York. The majority of those people were from &quot;the pagination desk and the copyediting desk,&quot; he said. </p>
<p>Mr. Christie also concretely lays out the new philosophy of <em>The Journal</em> that we've all been interpreting for a few months: Who needs editors?</p>
<p>&quot;The goal is fewer editors, more reporters,&quot; Christie said. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/wall-street-journal-goal-fewer-editors-more-reporters">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/wall-street-journal-goal-fewer-editors-more-reporters#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56120">Bob Christie</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/56121">North Brunswick Sentinel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54665">Robert Thomson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/rupert-murdoch-0">Rupert Murdoch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24283">The Wall Street Journal</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:46:43 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72401 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Arthur Sulzberger, Jr. on Rupert Murdoch: Competitors &#039;Can&#039;t Steal Our Readers&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/arthur-sulzberger-jr-were-not-going-change-because-murdoch</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><em>Ad Age</em> scored an extremely rare <a href="http://adage.com/mediaworks/article?article_id=129774">interview</a> with Arthur Sulzberger Jr. today. It's good placement for <em>The New York Times</em> publisher and chairman: his company is days away from releasing second-quarter earnings results, which aren't looking particularly great. Some good press is a welcome event since this year has arguably been one of Mr. Sulzberger's most challenging as publisher. The paper <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/17/business/media/17cnd-times.html?pagewanted=print">lost money</a> last quarter; he's <a href="/2008/after-33-years-pinch-separtes-his-wife-gail-gregg">getting divorced</a> from his wife; the paper experienced <a href="/2008/layoffs-times-and-keller-says-we-hope-worst-behind-us">lay offs</a> in the newsroom for the first time.</p>
<p>But you won't find any mention of the divorce in the profile, and only a small bit on the company's terrible year. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/arthur-sulzberger-jr-were-not-going-change-because-murdoch">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/arthur-sulzberger-jr-were-not-going-change-because-murdoch#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/arthur-sulzberger-jr">Arthur Sulzberger Jr.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/rupert-murdoch-0">Rupert Murdoch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:14:21 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72137 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Times vs. Journal Digital Battle Royale! Landman Says WSJ Has Done &#039;Nothing&#039; With Its Web Site</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/times-and-journal-digital-battle-royale-landman-says-journal-has-done-nothing-its-web-sit</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>It's a late, sleepy summer Friday, but <em>New York Times </em>online editor Jon Landman has some choice words for Rupert Murdoch, Robert Thomson and <em>The</em> <em>Wall Street Journal</em>'s online editor, Alan Murray, this afternoon. </p>
<p>Well, technically speaking, he doesn't name any of those people in his weekly memo, or the paper itself, but in his weekly briefing designed to discuss accomplishments for <a href="http://www.nytimes.com">nytimes.com</a>, he comes out swinging! Namely, he says <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/us">wsj.com</a> has accomplished nothing! </p>
<p>As Mr.Landman writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>There's some financial newspaper out there, on Wall Street or maybe in midtown, we aren't sure. There's new ownership, it seems, some rich guy who says he wants his paper to be more like ours. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/media/times-and-journal-digital-battle-royale-landman-says-journal-has-done-nothing-its-web-sit">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/media/times-and-journal-digital-battle-royale-landman-says-journal-has-done-nothing-its-web-sit#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27888">Jon Landman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54665">Robert Thomson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/rupert-murdoch-0">Rupert Murdoch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24283">The Wall Street Journal</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:43:43 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">72090 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Jane Friedman, Day 2</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/jane-friedman-day-two</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p class="MsoNormal"><em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/06/business/media/06harper.html?_r=1&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;ref=media&amp;adxnnlx=1212761006-wfFlCIlWjRf8uDm/WDUuoA">The Times</a></em> and the <em><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121271835836851003.html?mod=2_1567_leftbox&amp;apl=y&amp;r=207375">Wall Street Journal</a></em> have Day 2 stories on Jane Friedman’s abrupt exit from HarperCollins; both have interviews with Brian Murray, the new C.E.O., who says News Corp. chairman Rupert Murdoch, who has owned the publishing house for about 20 years, first summoned him about a promotion on Monday. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">An unnamed <em>Times</em> source says Ms. Friedman didn’t discuss vacating her post with Mr. Murdoch until two days later, a couple of hours before Gawker.com floated a rumor that she’d been fired.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">In the <em>Journal</em>, Mr. Murray reiterates what he told his staff at yesterday morning’s marketing meaning—that he talked to Mr. Murdoch and was assured that HarperCollins is not going up for sale. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&quot;He told me that the company won't be sold, that HarperCollins is a content company and that News Corp. is a content company,&quot; Mr. Murray is quoted as saying. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Why this is all happening now is no clearer today than it was the other night when the news first <a href="/2008/jane-friedman-out-harpercollins-ceo-brian-murray-taking-over">broke</a>.  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/jane-friedman-day-two">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/jane-friedman-day-two#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52361">HarperCollins</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51080">Jane Friedman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51111">News Corporation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/rupert-murdoch-0">Rupert Murdoch</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 10:59:57 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Observer Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70285 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Murdoch Says Journal Will Worry About Structure First, Then Find the Talent</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/murdoch-says-journal-will-worry-about-structure-first-then-find-talent</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Rupert Murdoch spoke at The D Conference <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-d-murdoch-on/">this week</a>, and laid out more non-specific but interesting plans for <em>The Journal.</em> </p>
<p>For months, it's been speculated that Murdoch cares more about figuring out the actual structure of the paper, and then he'll get down to the dirty business of assigning the right reporters to the right assignements, and signing a few superstars.  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/murdoch-says-journal-will-worry-about-structure-first-then-find-talent">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/murdoch-says-journal-will-worry-about-structure-first-then-find-talent#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28638">Dow Jones &amp;amp; Co. Inc.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24671">News Corporation Ltd.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/rupert-murdoch-0">Rupert Murdoch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/49802">The New York Times</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24283">The Wall Street Journal</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 16:49:24 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69898 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Journal at the News Corp. Castle! Opening Winter 2009</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/journal-news-corp-castle-opening-winter-2009</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p><em>The Wall Street Journal</em> and Dow Jones are less than a year away from moving their editorial departments to midtown. Dow Jones CEO Les Hinton said that <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-wall-street-journal-to-drop-well-wall-street/">the whole thing</a> is pretty &quot;fluid&quot; but it's likely that the <em>Journal</em>--and the Dow Jones news wires--will pack their bags for the News. Corp castle at 1211 Avenue of the Americas by February or March of next year. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/journal-news-corp-castle-opening-winter-2009">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/journal-news-corp-castle-opening-winter-2009#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52327">1211 Avenue of the Americas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/rupert-murdoch-0">Rupert Murdoch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24283">The Wall Street Journal</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 15:46:43 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69626 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Journal Editorial Independence Committee Unanimously Agreed Over &#039;Excellent&#039; Thomson Hire</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/journal-committee-unanimously-agreed-over-excellent-thomson-hire</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>We just spoke to Tom Bray, the de facto spokesman of the <em>Wall Street Journal'</em>s special committee for independence that has approval rights over new announcements for a managing editor. </p>
<p>&quot;We approved it today,&quot; he said.</p>
<p>He said that Mr. Thomson was approved by the committee unanimously and that it was a rolling vote conducted by e-mail and conference call. Mr. Thomson could have been approved with a majority 3-2 for the five-person committee.</p>
<p>He said that the committee was first informed about Mr. Thomson &quot;over a week ago.&quot; <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/journal-committee-unanimously-agreed-over-excellent-thomson-hire">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/journal-committee-unanimously-agreed-over-excellent-thomson-hire#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54665">Robert Thomson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/rupert-murdoch-0">Rupert Murdoch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24283">The Wall Street Journal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54379">Tom Bray</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 19:32:06 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69509 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Thomson as New Journal Editor: &#039;I Feel Privileged&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/thomson-new-journal-editor-i-feel-privileged</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>We just caught  up with Robert Thomson, who, <a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/robert-thomson-named-editor-wall-street-journal">it was just announced</a>, will be the newspaper's next managing editor, on the phone. &quot;I feel privileged,&quot; he said. &quot;I'm looking forward with much excitement to making the <em>Journal</em>, and its news wires, which is the greatest news organization in the world, even greater.&quot;  </p>
<p>He will move down to the newsroom's ninth floor tomorrow, and will take over chief editing duties over the paper immediately.  <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/thomson-new-journal-editor-i-feel-privileged">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/thomson-new-journal-editor-i-feel-privileged#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28638">Dow Jones &amp;amp; Co. Inc.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/28593">Marcus Brauchli</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50367">News Corp.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/54665">Robert Thomson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/rupert-murdoch">Rupert Murdoch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/rupert-murdoch-0">Rupert Murdoch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/24283">The Wall Street Journal</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 18:53:59 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69502 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dolans on the Brink of Owning Newsday</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/dolans-brink-owning-newsday</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Later this morning, <em>Newsday</em> should belong to the Dolans.</p>
<p>Their $650 million bid will likely be accepted by Tribune owner Sam Zell later this morning, and the only thing that stands in the way are &quot;minor details,&quot; said Charles Dolan in an<a href="http://www.newsday.com/news/local/ny-bznews0512,0,5357685.story"> interview last night</a> with<em> Newsday.</em> The <em>Times</em> reports that Charles and James Dolan were in Chicago two weeks ago talking to Sam Zell, and Cablevision bankers and lawyers are there now hashing out the final terms of the deal.   <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/dolans-brink-owning-newsday">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/dolans-brink-owning-newsday#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/51323">Cablevision</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/45132">Charles Dolan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/30153">James Dolan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52441">Newsday</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/rupert-murdoch-0">Rupert Murdoch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/sam-zell">Sam Zell</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 08:13:47 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Koblin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">69036 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
