<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.observer.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NY Observer &gt; Straphangers Campaign</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53934/feed</link>
 <description>Articles from Observer.com</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Transportation Advocates Agree: The M.T.A. Is in &#039;Deep Doo-Doo&#039;</title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/panel-looks-vain-ways-get-m-t-out-deep-doo-doo</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>Last night at the New York Blood Center auditorium on the Upper West Side, Assemblyman Micah Kellner moderated a panel on post-congestion-pricing solutions for city transportation that reached a general consensus but no real solution: Congestion pricing is not a bad idea, the proposal was just executed poorly, and right now the M.T.A. is, as one panelist said, in “deep doo-doo.”</p>
<p>“The congestion pricing plan proposed by Mayor Bloomberg failed to gain approval in the State Legislature in the spring,” said Kellner, who was a vocal proponent of congestion pricing. &quot;Neither the plan’s supporters nor its critics seem to have a firm idea of what to do next. <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/panel-looks-vain-ways-get-m-t-out-deep-doo-doo">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/politics/panel-looks-vain-ways-get-m-t-out-deep-doo-doo#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/politics">Politics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/42045">Gene Russianoff</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/55669">Jeffrey Zupan</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/27366">Micah Kellner</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/people/michael-bloomberg">Michael Bloomberg</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50124">NYPIRG</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/26243">Regional Plan Association</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53934">Straphangers Campaign</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/36075">Theodore Kheel</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:34:20 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Em Whitney</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71344 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Hey 3, 4, 6: You Got a Little Shmutz There </title>
 <link>http://www.observer.com/2008/subway-schmutz-report</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<!--paging_filter--><p>New York City commuters awoke this morning to the grim reality that improved mass transit service is not in the cards anytime soon; but if it’s any consolation subways have gotten (slightly) cleaner since 2005, according to the ninth annual “Subway Shmutz” report released today by the <a href="http://www.straphangers.org/">Straphangers Campaign</a>.
<p>On the whole, the results will probably not do much to brighten an otherwise gloomy day for subway passengers&mdash;unless you happen to ride the L or the 7. Between Sept. 20, 2007, and Jan. 11, 2008, Straphangers inspected 2,200 subway cars on 22 lines and found that half were “clean,&quot; up from 47 percent when the last survey was conducted in 2005.</p>
<p>Subway cars were rated on the cleanliness of floors and seats, according to the M.T.A.’s official standards. The ones that were &quot;basically dirt free&quot; or had &quot;light dirt&quot;—&quot;occasional 'ground-in' spots but generally clean&quot;—were rated clean. </p>
<p>The survey found nine lines had improved noticeably (2, 7, B, E, G, J/Z, L, M, and V);<span>  </span>six had deteriorated (3, 4, 6, C, D, and Q); and seven lines remained basically unchanged (1, 5, A, F, N, R, and W). <span class='read-more'><a href="http://www.observer.com/2008/subway-schmutz-report">&nbsp;read&nbsp;more&nbsp;&raquo;</a></span></p>]]></description>
 <comments>http://www.observer.com/2008/subway-schmutz-report#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/channel/real-estate">Real Estate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/50005">MTA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53934">Straphangers Campaign</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/52759">subway</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53932">Subway cleanliness</category>
 <category domain="http://www.observer.com/taxonomy/term/53933">Subway Schmutz Report</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:21:15 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lysandra Ohrstrom</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">66924 at http://www.observer.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
